"We are on the verge of a revolution in medicine: understanding, treating, and ultimately preventing the causes of degenerative aging. But medical revolutions only happen if we all stand up in support of funding and research. We did it for cancer. We're doing it for Alzheimer's. We can do it for aging - and create an era of longer, healthier lives!"

Required Reading
Activism and Advocacy
Calorie Restriction
The Community, Visualized
Cryonics
Healthy Life Extension Explained
Introductory Articles
Longevity Meme Newsletter
Methuselah Foundation
Mprize for Longevity Research
Stem Cells, Regenerative Medicine
SENS, Negligible Senescence
What is Anti-Aging?

On the Causes of Aging
Accumulating AGEs
The Failing Immune System
Junk in the Lysosome
Mitochondrial Free Radicals
Senescent Cells
Other Causes of Aging

Objections Answered
Boredom
Inequality and Economics
Overpopulation
Stagnation
The Tithonus Error
What About Retirement?

Recent Entries

  • Thoughts on Engineered Longevity and Selfishness
  • A Little More On Preventing Decline in Liver Function With Age
  • The Quest for Clearly Understood Signifiers
  • The Endocrine System, Longevity, and Methionine
  • There Are Old People and Fat People, But Few Old Fat People
  • More Cryonics History From Depressed Metabolism
  • Attitudes of Aging Researchers To Healthy Life Extension
  • Three Decades From Now
  • On Stem Cells, Aging, and Latexin
  • IGF-1, FOXO and Telomeres at Ouroboros
  • An Interview With Dave Gobel of the Methuselah Foundation
  • Tear Down the FDA
  • Advancing Knowledge of Stem Cells in the Brain
  • On the Psychology of Longevity Advocacy
  • Casting an Eye Upon Alcor's Board
  • The Murky Depths of Parkinson's Disease
  • How To Tell Whether It's Working
  • Gregory Stock at Aging 2008
  • Preparation is Only Helpful When Done Before You Need It
  • Cancer and Immune System Proficiency

    Weblogs of Interest
    Accelerating Future
    Ageing Research
    Anti-Ageing Research
    Alcor News
    Al Fin Longevity
    April's CR Diary
    Andart
    Biosingularity
    CRON Diary
    Cryonics Society
    Depressed Metabolism
    Distributed Republic
    Ethical Technology Blog
    Existence is Wonderful
    Frontier Channel
    Future Current
    FuturePundit
    grailsearch.org
    Longevity Science
    Marginal Revolution
    Metamagician and the Hellfire Club
    Methuselah Foundation Blog
    Mises Economics Blog
    Nanodot
    Ouroboros
    Overcoming Bias
    Pimm - Partial immortalization
    Responsible Nanotechnology
    ScienceBlogs
    Sentient Developments
    Singularity Institute Blog
    The Loom
    The Speculist
    Tangled Bank
    Transumanar

      
    Search

    Archives (Monthly)

    August 2008
    July 2008
    June 2008
    May 2008
    April 2008
    March 2008
    February 2008
    January 2008
    December 2007
    November 2007
    October 2007
    September 2007
    August 2007
    July 2007
    June 2007
    May 2007
    April 2007
    March 2007
    February 2007
    January 2007
    December 2006
    November 2006
    October 2006
    September 2006
    August 2006
    July 2006
    June 2006
    May 2006
    April 2006
    March 2006
    February 2006
    January 2006
    December 2005
    November 2005
    October 2005
    September 2005
    August 2005
    July 2005
    June 2005
    May 2005
    April 2005
    March 2005
    February 2005
    January 2005
    December 2004
    November 2004
    October 2004
    September 2004
    August 2004
    July 2004
    June 2004
    May 2004
    April 2004
    March 2004
    February 2004
    January 2004

    Creative Commons License
    Attribution, noncommercial, no derivative works. Play nice.

  • « Just What is a Stem Cell Anyway? | Main | State Funded Stem Cell Research Debates »

    Wednesday, January 5, 2005

    On Life Expectancy

    Life expectancy is an apparently straightforward term that hides a number of subtleties. From Wikipedia:

    In demography, life expectancy is a statistical measure of the average, or mathematical expected value, of the remaining lifetime of an individual in the given group. For non-human organisms the term lifespan is often used to indicate the average length of life in a given species.

    Notice that the life expectancy is heavily dependent on the criteria used to select the group. In countries with high infant mortality rates, the life expectancy at birth is highly sensitive to the rate of death in the first few years of life. In these cases, another measure such as life expectancy at age 10 can be used to exclude the effects of infant mortality to reveal the effects of other causes of death. Usually, though, life expectancy at birth is specified. To calculate it, it is assumed that current mortality levels remain constant throughout the lives of the hypothetical newborns.

    Large reductions in infant mortality are responsible for much of the increase in birth life expectancy over the past century. Other contributions come from the reduction in chronic illness and the resulting damage it causes - all damage to a living being is likely to reduce life span according to the Reliability Theory of aging. As James Vaupel put it recently:

    Life expectancy [at birth] is a measure of current conditions. It is not a prediction about how long somebody will live. But it's a measure of how long a person, a baby would live if that baby was confined to this year, could not get out of this year, was stuck with the conditions of this year.

    It is slowly occurring to me that many folks, mainstream journalists included, use the term "life expectancy" in a fairly imprecise way. It doesn't mean projected life span, and it's not even all that useful to mention life expectancy unless you carefully qualify the group you are talking about. Life expectancy for who, and under what assumptions? There are plenty of examples of this sort of imprecision and mistaken meaning in the current debate over social security.

    Posted by Reason at January 5, 2005 8:42 PM | TrackBack (3)

    Posted by: James Donahue at January 9, 2006 8:48 PM

    I think that the life expectancy will blossum, not only through stem cells, but for biotechnology through agraculture and genetic altering procedures (genetic modified foods, animals, and humans).

    Over the years, we went from gathered hunting, through agraculture. We are now exiting the industrial revolution, and comes to the next generation of civilization, which is high-tech era. This goes from mechanical, to bio-tech, and high-tech medicine. Pills with side effects will be replaced with function foods and supplements. We went from sugar, to artificial sugar, to natural herbal sweetners.

    Eventually, junk foods we loved to eat will turn to function foods. Like those Oreo cookies but with a balance of Omega-3, and Omega-6 fatty acids? We may see those "olive oils, coconut oils, and palm oils" replace those with oils with only the benifial fats. We may see "Cooking oils" which have beneficial saturated fats, while new types of snacks, desserts, and new foods that we problably don't see today, that could have the benefits, without the side effects of those chemicals.

    And stem cells may benefit pets and lifestock(cats, dogs, hamsters, horses, milk/meat cows), endangered animals (Those elephants, chimpanzees, you name it), and farm animals. Genetic modification could protect our and our pet's food, as well as endangered species, so that endangered species animals can be protected from diseases, and our farm foods will be protected. Genetic theorpy on humans can solve genetic-related diseases, like heart attacks, genetic-related diabetes, and others.

    And if this do happens, get ready to live for...well...another 200 years!

    [Posted by: James Donahue at January 9, 2006 8:48 PM]

    Post a comment; thoughtful, considered opinions are valued. Please note that comments incorporating ad hominem attacks, advertising and other forms of inappropriate behavior are likely to be deleted.










    Remember personal info?