"We are on the verge of a revolution in medicine: understanding, treating, and ultimately preventing the causes of degenerative aging. But medical revolutions only happen if we all stand up in support of funding and research. We did it for cancer. We're doing it for Alzheimer's. We can do it for aging - and create an era of longer, healthier lives!"

Required Reading
Activism and Advocacy
Calorie Restriction
The Community, Visualized
Cryonics
Healthy Life Extension Explained
Introductory Articles
Longevity Meme Newsletter
Methuselah Foundation
Mprize for Longevity Research
Stem Cells, Regenerative Medicine
SENS, Negligible Senescence
What is Anti-Aging?

On the Causes of Aging
Accumulating AGEs
The Failing Immune System
Junk in the Lysosome
Mitochondrial Free Radicals
Senescent Cells
Other Causes of Aging

Objections Answered
Boredom
Inequality and Economics
Overpopulation
Stagnation
The Tithonus Error
What About Retirement?

Recent Entries

  • Reliably Taking Care of Your Health Matters in the Long Term
  • Reactive Oxygen Species and Stem Cell Decline
  • New SAGE Crossroads Podcasts on the Evolution of Aging
  • Antioxidants
  • Cancer in the Context of Immune System Aging
  • My Project 10100 Submission: Mitochondrial Repair
  • Google's Project 10100 Initiative
  • Ouroboros at the Cold Spring Harbor Labs Conference
  • An Overview of Longevity Genes
  • The Integrative Genomics of Aging Group
  • Also, Try Not To Stab Yourself Repeatedly
  • Glycation Versus Your Mitochondria
  • Iron in the Lysosome
  • Calorie Restriction Changes Your Biochemistry For the Better
  • The New New Advertising Policy
  • Ferociously Complex, Is Metabolism
  • Telomeres, Health, and Centenarians
  • I Will Wager That These Mice Live Longer Too
  • Perspective
  • Why Aren't You Exercising Already?

    Weblogs of Interest
    Accelerating Future
    Ageing Research
    Anti-Ageing Research
    Alcor News
    Al Fin Longevity
    April's CR Diary
    Andart
    Biosingularity
    CRON Diary
    Cryonics Society
    Depressed Metabolism
    Distributed Republic
    Ethical Technology Blog
    Existence is Wonderful
    Frontier Channel
    Future Current
    FuturePundit
    grailsearch.org
    Longevity Science
    Marginal Revolution
    Metamagician and the Hellfire Club
    Methuselah Foundation Blog
    Mises Economics Blog
    Nanodot
    Ouroboros
    Overcoming Bias
    Pimm - Partial immortalization
    Responsible Nanotechnology
    ScienceBlogs
    Sentient Developments
    Singularity Institute Blog
    The Loom
    The Speculist
    Tangled Bank
    Transumanar

      
    Search

    Archives (Monthly)

    October 2008
    September 2008
    August 2008
    July 2008
    June 2008
    May 2008
    April 2008
    March 2008
    February 2008
    January 2008
    December 2007
    November 2007
    October 2007
    September 2007
    August 2007
    July 2007
    June 2007
    May 2007
    April 2007
    March 2007
    February 2007
    January 2007
    December 2006
    November 2006
    October 2006
    September 2006
    August 2006
    July 2006
    June 2006
    May 2006
    April 2006
    March 2006
    February 2006
    January 2006
    December 2005
    November 2005
    October 2005
    September 2005
    August 2005
    July 2005
    June 2005
    May 2005
    April 2005
    March 2005
    February 2005
    January 2005
    December 2004
    November 2004
    October 2004
    September 2004
    August 2004
    July 2004
    June 2004
    May 2004
    April 2004
    March 2004
    February 2004
    January 2004

    Creative Commons License
    Attribution, noncommercial, no derivative works. Play nice.

  • « A Libertarian View of Cancer | Main | Last Word on Obesity / Calorie Restriction / Mortality / Weight For Now »

    Wednesday, May 4, 2005

    R.U. Sirius Interviews Terry Grossman

    A quick link for you today: R.U. Sirius discusses radical life extension with Terry Grossman, co-author of Fantastic Voyage.

    People tend to be frightened by new ideas, but we need to recall that average life expectancy a century ago was only 47 years, but has now increased to 77 years today. This is a 63 per cent increase. The rate of technological progress is accelerating, and it is highly likely that we will see the same type of increase in life expectancy that occurred in the last century (1900-2000) to occur in the first 20 years of the present century (2000-2020). A 63 per cent increase in life expectancy would mean life spans of over 125 years in the next few years. As the biotechnology revolution begins to unfold (what we refer to as Bridge Two in our book), radical increases in life expectancy will result from several intersecting technologies that are already making their way from the research laboratory to patient care: stem cell therapies (using not only politically sensitive embryonic stem cells, but umbilical cord blood stem cells and even adult stem cells), therapeutic cloning (creation of specific cell types and organs as replacements for defective tissues and organs), bioengineered drugs and gene-based therapies (blocking the expression of harmful genes or their replacement with healthful genes). This will lead to Bridge Three, which will involve the full flowering of the nanotechnology and artificial intelligence revolutions, now in their infancy.

    Posted by Reason at May 4, 2005 12:33 AM | TrackBack (0)

    Posted by: Andrew the Great at May 4, 2005 5:58 AM

    "A 63 per cent increase in life expectancy would mean life spans of over 125 years in the next few years."

    I find that rather optimistic in my view. We still don't have the necessary funding directed towards real longevity research yet. The conservatism of the biogerontologists and the general public and the current stem cell controversy are both major hurdles in the quest for longevity. We must let our voices be heard if the scenario Grossman envisions is to be made reality.

    [Posted by: Andrew the Great at May 4, 2005 5:58 AM]

    Posted by: Reason at May 4, 2005 7:48 AM

    Agreed - obtaining public support and large scale funding for directed longevity research is necessary to achieve the timelines envisaged by advocates like Grossman, Kurzweil, Aubrey de Grey, etc.

    [Posted by: Reason at May 4, 2005 7:48 AM]

    Posted by: steph at May 4, 2005 7:54 PM

    Yes, I agree that we still do not have the funds directed towards longevity research.

    But I still think that the article is a decent view, as it talks about the revolution in biotechnology, and the coming nanotechnology which is already in the research stage.

    Both are a reality which will prolong lives, with or without a directed funding towards longevity. But hopefully, more people will come in to support longevity research in the shortest time possible.

    [Posted by: steph at May 4, 2005 7:54 PM]

    Post a comment; thoughtful, considered opinions are valued. Please note that comments incorporating ad hominem attacks, advertising and other forms of inappropriate behavior are likely to be deleted.










    Remember personal info?