"We are on the verge of a revolution in medicine: understanding, treating, and ultimately preventing the causes of degenerative aging. But medical revolutions only happen if we all stand up in support of funding and research. We did it for cancer. We're doing it for Alzheimer's. We can do it for aging - and create an era of longer, healthier lives!"

Required Reading
Activism and Advocacy
Calorie Restriction
The Community, Visualized
Cryonics
Healthy Life Extension Explained
Introductory Articles
Longevity Meme Newsletter
Methuselah Foundation
Mprize for Longevity Research
Stem Cells, Regenerative Medicine
SENS, Negligible Senescence
What is Anti-Aging?

On the Causes of Aging
Accumulating AGEs
The Failing Immune System
Junk in the Lysosome
Mitochondrial Free Radicals
Senescent Cells
Other Causes of Aging

Objections Answered
Boredom
Inequality and Economics
Overpopulation
Stagnation
The Tithonus Error
What About Retirement?

Recent Entries

  • Reliably Taking Care of Your Health Matters in the Long Term
  • Reactive Oxygen Species and Stem Cell Decline
  • New SAGE Crossroads Podcasts on the Evolution of Aging
  • Antioxidants
  • Cancer in the Context of Immune System Aging
  • My Project 10100 Submission: Mitochondrial Repair
  • Google's Project 10100 Initiative
  • Ouroboros at the Cold Spring Harbor Labs Conference
  • An Overview of Longevity Genes
  • The Integrative Genomics of Aging Group
  • Also, Try Not To Stab Yourself Repeatedly
  • Glycation Versus Your Mitochondria
  • Iron in the Lysosome
  • Calorie Restriction Changes Your Biochemistry For the Better
  • The New New Advertising Policy
  • Ferociously Complex, Is Metabolism
  • Telomeres, Health, and Centenarians
  • I Will Wager That These Mice Live Longer Too
  • Perspective
  • Why Aren't You Exercising Already?

    Weblogs of Interest
    Accelerating Future
    Ageing Research
    Anti-Ageing Research
    Alcor News
    Al Fin Longevity
    April's CR Diary
    Andart
    Biosingularity
    CRON Diary
    Cryonics Society
    Depressed Metabolism
    Distributed Republic
    Ethical Technology Blog
    Existence is Wonderful
    Frontier Channel
    Future Current
    FuturePundit
    grailsearch.org
    Longevity Science
    Marginal Revolution
    Metamagician and the Hellfire Club
    Methuselah Foundation Blog
    Mises Economics Blog
    Nanodot
    Ouroboros
    Overcoming Bias
    Pimm - Partial immortalization
    Responsible Nanotechnology
    ScienceBlogs
    Sentient Developments
    Singularity Institute Blog
    The Loom
    The Speculist
    Tangled Bank
    Transumanar

      
    Search

    Archives (Monthly)

    October 2008
    September 2008
    August 2008
    July 2008
    June 2008
    May 2008
    April 2008
    March 2008
    February 2008
    January 2008
    December 2007
    November 2007
    October 2007
    September 2007
    August 2007
    July 2007
    June 2007
    May 2007
    April 2007
    March 2007
    February 2007
    January 2007
    December 2006
    November 2006
    October 2006
    September 2006
    August 2006
    July 2006
    June 2006
    May 2006
    April 2006
    March 2006
    February 2006
    January 2006
    December 2005
    November 2005
    October 2005
    September 2005
    August 2005
    July 2005
    June 2005
    May 2005
    April 2005
    March 2005
    February 2005
    January 2005
    December 2004
    November 2004
    October 2004
    September 2004
    August 2004
    July 2004
    June 2004
    May 2004
    April 2004
    March 2004
    February 2004
    January 2004

    Creative Commons License
    Attribution, noncommercial, no derivative works. Play nice.

  • « Cynthia Kenyon to Address SENS At Technology Review | Main | Falling Costs of Biotech, Part III »

    Friday, May 20, 2005

    An Infrequent Stem Cell Research and Politics Update

    Since I'm paying less attention to stem cell research at Fight Aging! these days, I feel it's worth reminding folks that other blogs - such as Today's Stem Cell Research and Hype and Hope - keep up a regular patter of postings. But onwards; recent good news from Korea may, if we're lucky, cause productive ripples in restrictive Western stem cell politics:

    Robert Lanza of Advanced Cell Technology comments that the researchers "have demonstrated that therapeutic cloning can work in a medically useful way. Prior to this study, there was a question as to whether it was biologically possible. ... The answer is yes, it works. And they did it in a dramatic way - they used therapeutic cloning to derive stem cells that genetically matched patients who had real diseases that could be treated using this technology."

    Ronald Bailey put out a piece for Tech Central Station in a very short period of time - it hits many of the points I was considering for this post:

    The Korean researchers allowed the stem cells to differentiate into various cell types including skin, nerve, kidney and muscle cells. The stem cells produced by Hwang and his team are immunological matches for specific patients, and that means that if they were transplanted that they would not cause immune rejection. While this research is a tremendous breakthrough, the researchers hasten to point out that it is too early to consider actually transplanting the cells into patients. First, because some of the cloned stem cell lines carry the defective genes that led to diabetes and immunodeficiency disease. Second, because researchers still have to learn how to safely and stably transform stem cells into specific cell types, say, pancreatic islet cells to treat diabetes.

    ...

    The House of Representatives has twice voted to criminalize precisely this research, proposing to toss therapeutic cloning researchers into prison for up to ten years and fine them one million dollars. In fact, if this effort to criminalize research on cloned human stem cells were to succeed, Americans who go abroad to seek cloned stem cell treatments, say, to cure their diabetes, could be jailed for up to ten years for illegally "importing" cloned stem cells. The Bush Administration was also pushing the United Nations to adopt a treaty to outlaw both cloning to produce transplants and reproductive cloning.

    Some of the most promising research into cures for age-related conditions has been held back and underfunded for years in the US. But regular readers know this already; much of the recent news regarding stem cell research has been nothing but politics. It is a great pity that we live in a society that places so little value on individual responsibility, freedom and choice, especially in those areas of human endeavor where the most good could be accomplished. Centralization and socialization of medicine are terrible things; why do we allow the uninformed and unskilled to squander resources and hold life and death decisions over our heads?

    The bottom line: politicized medical research is slower, less effective, less efficient medical research. The slower it goes, the more likely you are to suffer and die from an age-related condition that might otherwise have been cured. The slower it goes, the less likely we are to make serious progress towards a cure for the aging process itself. Politicians can do nothing but destroy and delay; they should leave well alone - let those who are willing to work put their talents, unhindered, towards creating longer, healthier lives for all.

    Posted by Reason at May 20, 2005 12:12 AM | TrackBack (0)

    Posted by: FutureQ at May 20, 2005 6:36 PM

    Sen. Chris Smith (RN.J.) was on CNN today shouting over top of his Dem counterpart desperately pushing the Cord Blood Stem Cell Act of 2005 (S. 681).

    http://tinyurl.com/a27e7

    He was full of disinformation and lies. He contended that Adult Stem Cells were better than Embryonic and that Cord Blood was also a viable option. When his counterpart tried explaining his errors Smith belligerently and frantically tried to repeatedly butt in. He kept talking over the other's dialogue and it became very disruptive.

    He totally overlooks or maybe is unaware that for one thing, as far as I know, cord blood stem cell therapies would cause immunological rejection for anyone not closely related to the infant donor. The parents might be a match to the cord blood of a new born, that new born is obviously and more likely than the parents, maybe, would be the infant's siblings.

    At bottom what he is proposing whether aware of it or not, since he wants this to be the only option and to supplant Embryonic SCR, is that people would have to create children just for cures. "We created you special Timmy in order to save your father's life but we love you just as much as your grown sister that we conceived in love." To me this is reprehensible.

    For anyone reading this that may be still on the fence trying to decide for yourself the moral dilemma, "Is extracting stem cells from an engineered blastocyst, not a sperm and egg conceived embryo, really murder or not?", because some wish to blur the lines with obscure unscientific emotional notions like engineered blastocysts are "potential humans", then you need to see this video of a lecture by Dr. Lee M. Silver:

    http://tinyurl.com/am9dz

    Please note carefully the subject of and fate of the 61 differentiated stem cells vursus the separated 3 of a total of 64 in day 7 of division, then wonder about some people's priorities. Shower anyone?

    "Centralization and socialization of medicine are terrible things". Ironically Reason the people most accused of socializing medicine, the Dems, are the ones most in favor of our *actually having the freedom* to do Embryonic Stem Cell Research and form cures from Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer, also called Therapeutic Cloning and misleadingly just Cloning by its foes. Go figure, huh.

    In my case I'll take it any way I get it, socialized or not. The other side is politicizing enough without our waging in on these esoteric issues. I agree with Aubrey, when SENS becomes available and SCR is bound to be one component, it will have to take governments to fund it for everyone due to the absolute and immediate and widespread demand or chaos will ensue. I guess that will be the ultimate socialized medicine.

    FutureQ

    [Posted by: FutureQ at May 20, 2005 6:36 PM]

    Posted by: John De Herrera at May 25, 2005 11:48 AM

    Isn't it true that George Bush senior and Ronald Reagan both banned fetal cell research? Perhaps research could have been much further ahead if it had received support - rather than obsticles. These obstructionists could pay a heavy price when they get a disease (Reagan) that could be cured with new science.

    [Posted by: John De Herrera at May 25, 2005 11:48 AM]

    Post a comment; thoughtful, considered opinions are valued. Please note that comments incorporating ad hominem attacks, advertising and other forms of inappropriate behavior are likely to be deleted.










    Remember personal info?