"We are on the verge of a revolution in medicine: understanding, treating, and ultimately preventing the causes of degenerative aging. But medical revolutions only happen if we all stand up in support of funding and research. We did it for cancer. We're doing it for Alzheimer's. We can do it for aging - and create an era of longer, healthier lives!"

Required Reading
Activism and Advocacy
Calorie Restriction
The Community, Visualized
Cryonics
Healthy Life Extension Explained
Introductory Articles
Longevity Meme Newsletter
Methuselah Foundation
Mprize for Longevity Research
Stem Cells, Regenerative Medicine
SENS, Negligible Senescence
What is Anti-Aging?

On the Causes of Aging
Accumulating AGEs
The Failing Immune System
Junk in the Lysosome
Mitochondrial Free Radicals
Senescent Cells
Other Causes of Aging

Objections Answered
Boredom
Inequality and Economics
Overpopulation
Stagnation
The Tithonus Error
What About Retirement?

Recent Entries

  • Reliably Taking Care of Your Health Matters in the Long Term
  • Reactive Oxygen Species and Stem Cell Decline
  • New SAGE Crossroads Podcasts on the Evolution of Aging
  • Antioxidants
  • Cancer in the Context of Immune System Aging
  • My Project 10100 Submission: Mitochondrial Repair
  • Google's Project 10100 Initiative
  • Ouroboros at the Cold Spring Harbor Labs Conference
  • An Overview of Longevity Genes
  • The Integrative Genomics of Aging Group
  • Also, Try Not To Stab Yourself Repeatedly
  • Glycation Versus Your Mitochondria
  • Iron in the Lysosome
  • Calorie Restriction Changes Your Biochemistry For the Better
  • The New New Advertising Policy
  • Ferociously Complex, Is Metabolism
  • Telomeres, Health, and Centenarians
  • I Will Wager That These Mice Live Longer Too
  • Perspective
  • Why Aren't You Exercising Already?

    Weblogs of Interest
    Accelerating Future
    Ageing Research
    Anti-Ageing Research
    Alcor News
    Al Fin Longevity
    April's CR Diary
    Andart
    Biosingularity
    CRON Diary
    Cryonics Society
    Depressed Metabolism
    Distributed Republic
    Ethical Technology Blog
    Existence is Wonderful
    Frontier Channel
    Future Current
    FuturePundit
    grailsearch.org
    Longevity Science
    Marginal Revolution
    Metamagician and the Hellfire Club
    Methuselah Foundation Blog
    Mises Economics Blog
    Nanodot
    Ouroboros
    Overcoming Bias
    Pimm - Partial immortalization
    Responsible Nanotechnology
    ScienceBlogs
    Sentient Developments
    Singularity Institute Blog
    The Loom
    The Speculist
    Tangled Bank
    Transumanar

      
    Search

    Archives (Monthly)

    October 2008
    September 2008
    August 2008
    July 2008
    June 2008
    May 2008
    April 2008
    March 2008
    February 2008
    January 2008
    December 2007
    November 2007
    October 2007
    September 2007
    August 2007
    July 2007
    June 2007
    May 2007
    April 2007
    March 2007
    February 2007
    January 2007
    December 2006
    November 2006
    October 2006
    September 2006
    August 2006
    July 2006
    June 2006
    May 2006
    April 2006
    March 2006
    February 2006
    January 2006
    December 2005
    November 2005
    October 2005
    September 2005
    August 2005
    July 2005
    June 2005
    May 2005
    April 2005
    March 2005
    February 2005
    January 2005
    December 2004
    November 2004
    October 2004
    September 2004
    August 2004
    July 2004
    June 2004
    May 2004
    April 2004
    March 2004
    February 2004
    January 2004

    Creative Commons License
    Attribution, noncommercial, no derivative works. Play nice.

  • « Addendum to a Little Friday Science | Main | Drivers of the Biotechnology Revolution »

    Saturday, April 29, 2006

    Anti-Aging, a Term Lost to the Junkyard

    A conversation, in the wider modern context, is something that wends its way across months of time and hundreds of thousands of minds via blogs, emails, other websites, letters, the spoken word, radio, TV, magazines and newspapers, to name but a few of the possible paths. Branching and joining threads of thought and ideas hop and jump from media to media - but the most recent, internet-era additions to the possible paths of conversation are what really makes it all froth and bubble. Important activities and advocacy coalesce from this conversation as a matter of course; meritous and popular ideas are far more likely to gain the support they deserve when the cost of communication is so low. The MPrize for anti-aging research and the all-volunteer Methuselah Foundation are excellent examples of firm and directed organizations that came from the foam of the internet; spontaneous self-organization in action.

    Unfortunately, some topics just can't be discussed well in email, blog and website; they are drowned out by the efforts of those trying to make money. So it is with scientific anti-aging research and the vast sea of static produced by the purveyors of useless, all brand and no cattle "anti-aging" products. Just take a look at what is seen when searching for any sane, non-monetary, responsible discussion of anti-aging science on Google, Google News, Google Blog Search and Technorati - a blizzard of junk and nonsense. It's the same everywhere you look, a storm of short-termist profit seeking that destroys the primary utility of the internet for these concepts, making it impossible for diverse groups to collaborate, exchange ideas and build new organizations as a part of a serious, ongoing cultural conversation on anti-aging science.

    So we all lose out - including the short-termists. How's it feel to be contributing to your own demise, you out there with the HGH ads, cherry-picked studies and spam sites?

    I briefly set down a few thoughts on the future of branding and discussion last month. Anti-aging is beyond salvage as a term for discussion; we should move on and use other language to describe the technologies of healthy life extension and advanced medicine to extend healthy life spans.

    Technorati tags: , , ,

    Posted by Reason at April 29, 2006 10:37 PM | TrackBack (0)

    Posted by: Joe at April 30, 2006 10:25 AM

    These search engines work by showing the sites with the most linking sites to it, ie page rank. There is already a big market of impressible people that are searching these terms looking for the latest cream. If we could overtake those creams in the search ranking we would have a vast larger audience.

    Maybe instead of not using anti-aging any more we should make it our primary term. Try to take real science to this market of quasi-science. LEF already gets #10 on google for a search on anti-aging if other sites start using the term more we and cross linking we could really bring up our rank.

    [Posted by: Joe at April 30, 2006 10:25 AM]

    Posted by: Joe at April 30, 2006 10:31 AM

    My idea has aready worked. Your search in google blogs and Technorati has your post as number one when searching for "anti-aging". Your blog entry is 10 hours old and there are others only 1 hour old below yours.

    [Posted by: Joe at April 30, 2006 10:31 AM]

    Posted by: Reason at April 30, 2006 11:41 AM

    One of the implicit points is that the presence of the market means that a great many people are engineering these search results; a new post by me will be near the top briefly (especially in Technorati that defaults to a most recent sort order), but will quickly be drowned by the hundreds of spam posts. For the conversation to work, the relevant and useful stuff has be consistently easily available - and that would mean a head-to-head contest with those marketeers who are spending tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars in aggregate to populate these search listings. Not too viable unless we outnumber them in terms of content production.

    [Posted by: Reason at April 30, 2006 11:41 AM]

    Posted by: Joe at April 30, 2006 4:21 PM

    We don't have to be #1. Just in the first page or two.

    [Posted by: Joe at April 30, 2006 4:21 PM]

    Posted by: Joe at May 1, 2006 12:51 PM

    Reason if you want to continue this discussion I have started a thread at imminst

    http://www.imminst.org/forum/index.php?act=ST&f=142&t=10386&s=

    [Posted by: Joe at May 1, 2006 12:51 PM]

    Post a comment; thoughtful, considered opinions are valued. Please note that comments incorporating ad hominem attacks, advertising and other forms of inappropriate behavior are likely to be deleted.










    Remember personal info?