"We are on the verge of a revolution in medicine: understanding, treating, and ultimately preventing the causes of degenerative aging. But medical revolutions only happen if we all stand up in support of funding and research. We did it for cancer. We're doing it for Alzheimer's. We can do it for aging - and create an era of longer, healthier lives!"

Required Reading
Activism and Advocacy
Calorie Restriction
The Community, Visualized
Cryonics
Healthy Life Extension Explained
Introductory Articles
Longevity Meme Newsletter
Methuselah Foundation
Mprize for Longevity Research
Stem Cells, Regenerative Medicine
SENS, Negligible Senescence
What is Anti-Aging?

On the Causes of Aging
Accumulating AGEs
The Failing Immune System
Junk in the Lysosome
Mitochondrial Free Radicals
Senescent Cells
Other Causes of Aging

Objections Answered
Boredom
Inequality and Economics
Overpopulation
Stagnation
The Tithonus Error
What About Retirement?

Recent Entries

  • Graying Hair and Fading Stem Cells
  • Calorie Restriction and DNA Damage
  • The Methuselah Gene, Examined
  • Calorie Restriction Protects Against Age-Related Muscle Loss
  • The Things You Can Change
  • Reminder: Aging 2008 on June 27th at UCLA
  • Ageless Animals, the Sea Urchin Edition
  • Aging
  • 500 Scientists
  • Horizons For Immunotherapy
  • Revisiting Sirtuins
  • Complicating WILT
  • Aging as a Challenge For Regenerative Medicine
  • More On Telomere Shortening and Mitochondrial Dysfunction
  • Signs of Rose-Type Immortality in Humans?
  • Next Steps For Longevity Science at the Methuselah Foundation
  • Updates at Ouroboros
  • Why Do We Accumulate Senescent Cells Anyway?
  • The Immune Response Connection to Alzheimer's Disease
  • The Million Year Lifespan

    Weblogs of Interest
    Accelerating Future
    Ageing Research
    Alcor News
    Al Fin Longevity
    April's CR Diary
    Andart
    Anti-Aging Medicine & Science
    Biosingularity
    CRON Diary
    Cryonics Society
    Depressed Metabolism
    Digital Crusader
    Distributed Republic
    Ethical Technology Blog
    Existence is Wonderful
    Frontier Channel
    Future Current
    FuturePundit
    grailsearch.org
    Longevity Science
    Marginal Revolution
    Metamagician and the Hellfire Club
    Methuselah Foundation Blog
    Mises Economics Blog
    Nanodot
    Ouroboros
    Overcoming Bias
    Pimm - Partial immortalization
    Responsible Nanotechnology
    ScienceBlogs
    Sentient Developments
    Singularity Institute Blog
    The Loom
    The Speculist
    Tangled Bank
    Transumanar

      
    Search

    Archives (Monthly)

    June 2008
    May 2008
    April 2008
    March 2008
    February 2008
    January 2008
    December 2007
    November 2007
    October 2007
    September 2007
    August 2007
    July 2007
    June 2007
    May 2007
    April 2007
    March 2007
    February 2007
    January 2007
    December 2006
    November 2006
    October 2006
    September 2006
    August 2006
    July 2006
    June 2006
    May 2006
    April 2006
    March 2006
    February 2006
    January 2006
    December 2005
    November 2005
    October 2005
    September 2005
    August 2005
    July 2005
    June 2005
    May 2005
    April 2005
    March 2005
    February 2005
    January 2005
    December 2004
    November 2004
    October 2004
    September 2004
    August 2004
    July 2004
    June 2004
    May 2004
    April 2004
    March 2004
    February 2004
    January 2004

    Creative Commons License
    Attribution, noncommercial, no derivative works. Play nice.

  • « A Lesson to Learn from Progress in Calorie Restriction Advocacy | Main | If My Cells Live Longer, I Live Longer ... Right? »

    Monday, June 19, 2006

    Comments Requested on Superlongevity and Boredom

    Mark Walker is requesting comments on an early draft of a paper on superlongevity and boredom. Take a look and see what you think:

    As usual, comments welcome. Here is the abstract:

    "Superlongevity" may be thought of as doubling (or more) the human lifespan through the use of technology. Critics have argued that superlongevity will inevitably lead to boredom, while proponents have denied this claim. Rather than attempting to resolve the debate through theoretical speculation, I argue that allowing persons to become superlongevitists can be construed as an experiment to decide this issue. Further, the moral benefits of conducting the experiment greatly outweigh the moral costs of not running the experiment.

    A conclusion I wholeheartedly endorse. Run the experiment!

    The idea that a far longer, healthier life somehow implies a doom comprised of boredom - and that this renders the whole exercise pointless from the outset - is one of those oddly widespread and utterly silly kneejerk objections to healthy life extension:

    Even active, inventive, happy people often assume that longer healthy lives will bring boredom through repetition, however. Ask someone you know how long it would take them to run out of new things to do and become bored if they could live in good health forever. Your friend will give you an outrageously low number of years, I'll bet. If you stop to think about it - rather than just going on instinct - you'll soon realize that you are never going to be any more likely to become bored of life than you are right now. There is simply too much to do, too many different things to think, feel, do and accomplish. In fact, the advance of technology means there is always more to do with each new passing year. New possibilities, activities and enhancements to the quality and variety of life are constantly opening up.

    If you enjoy healthy life, you'll most likely enjoy more healthy life - if you put in the effort to make it interesting. That's your responsibility; no-one else is going to help you make a life you like. So put in the effort! Don't let yourself be conned into accepting age-related suffering and death by those who haven't thought seriously about the issue. Or by those who couldn't care less about your welfare.

    We live in a unique time: on the cusp of a biotechnology revolution that could deliver the keys to greatly extended healthy longevity and cures for age-related frailty and disease. But it won't happen in time for those of us reading this today if we all shrug our shoulders and fail to speed progress towards these worthy goals.

    Technorati tags:

    Posted by Reason at June 19, 2006 8:00 PM | TrackBack (2)

    Posted by: Berend de Boer at June 19, 2006 10:00 PM

    Sort of the choice between hunger or obesity...

    [Posted by: Berend de Boer at June 19, 2006 10:00 PM]

    Posted by: Reason at June 19, 2006 10:23 PM

    Quite.

    [Posted by: Reason at June 19, 2006 10:23 PM]

    Posted by: Joe at June 20, 2006 8:13 AM

    I have a long list of things I want to spend a lifetime mastering in my head. I figure 20-60 years on each one and I will never be bored.

    [Posted by: Joe at June 20, 2006 8:13 AM]

    Posted by: J Thomason at June 20, 2006 9:43 AM

    Considering that in the past 100 years or so we've already achieved "super longevity" (average human lifespan used to be ~40 years, and now it's approaching 80), I'd think that the "debate" has already been answered. How many people over 40 are so bored that they wish they were dead?

    Anyway, given unlimited lifespan (and unlimited money), I could see myself happily exploring the US (let alone the world) for many years. And by the time I was done, I could start all over again, since all the places I had visited to start with will have changed (and my memory would have faded) enough so that they were new again.

    Add new books (plus old books that I have always wanted to read but haven't had the time), ect. ect.

    Anyone who advances the boredom argument is a fool.

    [Posted by: J Thomason at June 20, 2006 9:43 AM]

    Posted by: ND at June 20, 2006 12:27 PM

    The usual answer applies: let people decide for themselves. Those who feel bored after a certain number of years are free to leave life.

    Also, even if one eventually would get bored (which one wouldn't, but for the sake of the argument...), wouldn't it be great to live until you actually don't want to live anymore, rather than spending most of your life slowly dying while wishing to live more? It's the difference between staying at a party for as long as it is fun, and being forced to leave while it still IS fun.

    The it-would-get-bored argument is more of a psychological confession than an actual argument. Maybe THEY can't see enough value in life, but I certainly can.

    [Posted by: ND at June 20, 2006 12:27 PM]

    Posted by: S Jackson at June 26, 2006 9:52 AM

    Maybe when I am 100 I will be FINALLY finished with my house project! No, I am not bored with it but I am SLOW!

    [Posted by: S Jackson at June 26, 2006 9:52 AM]

    Post a comment; thoughtful, considered opinions are valued. Please note that comments incorporating ad hominem attacks, advertising and other forms of inappropriate behavior are likely to be deleted.










    Remember personal info?