|
Off topic:
Hi Reason,
I notice that you've written a few times about Folding@home here, and that there's a LM F@H team.
I was wondering if you knew about Rosetta@Home (http://boinc.bakerlab.org/rosetta/)?
From what I know of both projects, Rosetta@home seems a bit more exciting and worth contributing to, in part because they currently have less CPU cycles than Folding so any contribution makes a bigger marginal difference, but also because the science is really great; predicting the shape (and thus functionality) of proteins based on their amino acid sequences (saving lots of time and efforts to do x-ray crystallography or NMRI -- both of which can be limited) is, afaik, a holy grail of biotech.
Could be tremendously useful in designing cures and speeding up our understanding of proteins. The folding process itself is also useful, but it doesn't seem quite as useful as computational prediction of the final state of proteins.
I could be misunderstanding the science of both projects, though. I'm not yet all that knowledgeable on proteins yet, but I'm working on it.
Either way, I'd love your opinion on this, and if you find Rosetta@home as interesting as I do (Dr. David Baker, the head of the project, posts in a journal on the R@H forums), I hope you'll consider adding it as a recommended project on the LM website.
Cheers,
[Posted by: Michael G.R. at October 28, 2007 1:21 PM]
|