"We are on the verge of a revolution in medicine: understanding, treating, and ultimately preventing the causes of degenerative aging. But medical revolutions only happen if we all stand up in support of funding and research. We did it for cancer. We're doing it for Alzheimer's. We can do it for aging - and create an era of longer, healthier lives!"

Required Reading
Activism and Advocacy
Calorie Restriction
The Community, Visualized
Cryonics
Healthy Life Extension Explained
Introductory Articles
Longevity Meme Newsletter
Methuselah Foundation
Mprize for Anti-Aging Research
Stem Cells, Regenerative Medicine
SENS, Negligible Senescence
What is Anti-Aging?

High Quality Supplements, Vitamins
High Quality Supplements, Vitamins

On the Causes of Aging
Accumulating AGEs
Aging Immune System
Junk in the Lysosome
Mitochondrial Free Radicals
Other Causes of Aging

Objections Answered
Boredom
Inequality and Economics
Overpopulation
Stagnation
The Tithonus Error
What About Retirement?

Recent Entries

  • On the Erosion of Telomeres
  • Things We Don't Need To Know In Order To Cure Aging
  • The Value of a Longevity Therapy
  • On Expanding the Audience
  • Timelines For Agelessness Through Medical Technology
  • Understanding Aging Conference, Los Angeles, June 27th
  • Upgrading Mitochondrial DNA to Cause Less Damage
  • Our Bioartificial Future
  • What is Cryonics?
  • Electric Pulse Interview With Aubrey de Grey
  • "Should" is a Dangerous Word
  • Small Steps Towards Engineered, Hyperefficient, Artificial Immune Systems
  • An Interview With Peter Thiel
  • The Latest Rejuvenation Research, April 2008
  • Comments on the Sirtris Acquisition
  • Body Temperature and Longevity
  • A Look at the Longevity Dividend View
  • Thrashing Out Your Regenerative Medicine Thesis Online
  • But Enough About You
  • Aging Doesn't Just Kill People, It Kills Them Horribly

    Weblogs of Interest
    Accelerating Future
    Ageing Research
    Alcor News
    April's CR Diary
    Andart
    Anti-Aging Medicine & Science
    Biosingularity
    CRON Diary
    Cryonics Society
    Depressed Metabolism
    Digital Crusader
    Distributed Republic
    Ethical Technology Blog
    Existence is Wonderful
    Frontier Channel
    Future Current
    FuturePundit
    grailsearch.org
    Longevity Science
    Marginal Revolution
    Metamagician and the Hellfire Club
    Methuselah Foundation Blog
    Mises Economics Blog
    Nanodot
    Ouroboros
    Overcoming Bias
    Pimm - Partial immortalization
    Responsible Nanotechnology
    ScienceBlogs
    Sentient Developments
    Singularity Institute Blog
    The Loom
    The Speculist
    Tangled Bank
    Transumanar

      
    Search

    Archives (Monthly)

    May 2008
    April 2008
    March 2008
    February 2008
    January 2008
    December 2007
    November 2007
    October 2007
    September 2007
    August 2007
    July 2007
    June 2007
    May 2007
    April 2007
    March 2007
    February 2007
    January 2007
    December 2006
    November 2006
    October 2006
    September 2006
    August 2006
    July 2006
    June 2006
    May 2006
    April 2006
    March 2006
    February 2006
    January 2006
    December 2005
    November 2005
    October 2005
    September 2005
    August 2005
    July 2005
    June 2005
    May 2005
    April 2005
    March 2005
    February 2005
    January 2005
    December 2004
    November 2004
    October 2004
    September 2004
    August 2004
    July 2004
    June 2004
    May 2004
    April 2004
    March 2004
    February 2004
    January 2004

    Creative Commons License
    Attribution, noncommercial, no derivative works. Play nice.

  • « The Encouraging Spread of Discussion of Longevity Science | Main | $1000 For SENS Research When Our Folding@Home Team Passes Rank 200 »

    Monday, December 17, 2007

    If There Is Even a Single Simplicity Lurking Within Cancer...

    If there is even a single simplicity lurking within cancer, a single commonality of biochemistry, a single dominant class of mechanism that passes through a bottleneck of complexity, then cancer will soon be a thing of the past. The technologies and research communities of this present biotechnology revolution will run it over and squash it flat. The common thread will be found, and therapies cranked out in short order to disrupt or suppress its operation.

    So we can hope that varieties of the "cancer's evolutionary tendencies guarantee its unlimited variance and unremitting complexity" argument turn out to be false in the end. It's a reasonable thing to hope for, given the way in which evolved systems tend to be constructed. Take this research reported in EurekAlert!, for example:

    researchers have devised a way to generate large numbers of human breast cancer stem cells in mice and have discovered a genetic switch that regulates critical properties of the cells. The regulator, which belongs to a class of molecules called microRNAs, pushes the stem cells to become more differentiated and less tumorigenic through its ability to switch off particular genes.

    ...

    With a ready supply of cancer stem cells, the researchers were able to measure levels of microRNAs, small gene regulators that are known to influence a gene’s ability to create proteins important for cell growth and differentiation. They found that cancer stem cells contained low amounts of several microRNAs compared to more mature tumor cells or stem cells that had differentiated in culture.

    They zeroed in on a tumor-supressing microRNA called let-7. When the team activated let-7 in the stem cells, they lost their ability to self-renew and began to differentiate. The cells also became less able to form tumors in mice or to metastasize. Further studies showed that let-7 did this by switching off two cancer-related genes: the oncogene Ras, and HMG2A, which when switched off caused the cells to differentiate.

    If this finding applies to other tumor types, let-7 may offer a unique opportunity to attack tumor stem cells using therapeutic RNA. Delivery of the let-7 RNA to tumors could potentially deplete stem cells by pushing them down the path of differentiation.

    This is one of a hundred different investigations into the biomechanisms of cancer that might - maybe - expand out to something that could be called a cure for cancer. If there is key, or class of keys to the creation of cancer - a point at which a spanner can be thrown into the works with the biotechnologies of the 2000s and 2010s - I'll wager it will be found and exploited sometime within the next decade.

    Posted by Reason at December 17, 2007 9:47 PM | TrackBack (0)

    Posted by: davros at December 18, 2007 7:15 PM

    Here is your cure for cancer check this out

    http://thisweekintech.com/fib21

    If this new approach proves out this may be the biggest medical breakthrough in history.
    Check out the site and the audio interveiw with the doctor himself.

    [Posted by: davros at December 18, 2007 7:15 PM]

    Posted by: Reason at December 18, 2007 7:51 PM

    Yes, DCA has been in the news a lot. A sensible counterpoint to the hype on DCA can be found here:

    http://scienceblogs.com/insolence/2007/01/in_which_my_words_will_be_misinterpreted.php

    Insofar as great breakthroughs in cancer go, the work of Dr. Cui is much more interesting, as the general level of progress on cancer stem cells.

    http://blog.methuselahfoundation.org/2007/09/sens3_report_the_gift_versus_c_1.html

    [Posted by: Reason at December 18, 2007 7:51 PM]

    Post a comment; thoughtful, considered opinions are valued. Please note that comments incorporating ad hominem attacks, advertising and other forms of inappropriate behavior are likely to be deleted.










    Remember personal info?