"We are on the verge of a revolution in medicine: understanding, treating, and ultimately preventing the causes of degenerative aging. But medical revolutions only happen if we all stand up in support of funding and research. We did it for cancer. We're doing it for Alzheimer's. We can do it for aging - and create an era of longer, healthier lives!"

Email Contact
reason -at- fightaging -dot- org

  
Search

The Causes of Aging
Accumulating AGEs
Buildup of Amyloid Between Cells
The Failing Immune System
Declining Lysosomal Function
Mitochondrial DNA Damage
Senescent Cells
Other Causes of Aging

Required Reading
Calorie Restriction
The Community, Visualized
Cryonics
Engineered Negligible Senescence
Envisaging a World Without the FDA
Healthy Life Extension Explained
Introductory Articles
Longevity Meme Newsletter
The Odds of Human Longevity Mutations
The Need For Activism and Advocacy
Stem Cells, Regenerative Medicine
Twelve Ways to Extend Mouse Life Span
The Vital Debate in Aging Research
What is Anti-Aging?

Initiatives
Biogerontology Research Foundation
Campaign Against Aging
Campaign for Aging Research
LifeStar Institute
Immortality Institute
Maximum Life Foundation
Methuselah Foundation
Mprize for Longevity Research
Science Against Aging (Translate)
SENS Foundation

Benefiting From Medical Research
How to Read Scientific Research
Researching Therapies and Clinical Trials

Objections Answered
Boredom
Inequality and Economics
Overpopulation
Stagnation
Being Older for Longer?
What About Retirement?

Recent Entries

  • Cells, Hearts, and Brains
  • Rapamycin Research Rolls Onward
  • Reversing Blindness in Retinitis Pigmentosa With Stem Cells
  • The Body Does Work to Break Down Damaging Aggregates
  • A Few Cancer Stem Cell Articles
  • The Latest on Mitochondrial Uncoupling
  • Longevity Research at the Science Network
  • Journalists Are In the Business of Gathering Eyeballs, Not Truth
  • @ging, a New Aging Science Blog
  • Redefining Bionics Again
  • Encouraging Transparency in Life Science Fundraising
  • TIME Magazine on Slowing Aging and Longevity Research
  • The Case for Cryonics
  • Malthusian Visions
  • A Profile of Dave Kekich of the Maximum Life Foundation
  • So Very Many Pressing Distractions
  • Six Years of Fight Aging!
  • Looking Ahead to Mitochondrial DNA Replacement Therapies
  • Spermidine and Another Vote For Autophagy
  • Raising the Dead

    Blogs of Interest
    @ging
    Accelerating Future
    Ageing Research
    Alcor News
    Al Fin Longevity
    April's CR Diary
    Andart
    Biosingularity
    CRON Diary
    Cryonics Society
    Depressed Metabolism
    Distributed Republic
    Ethical Technology Blog
    Existence is Wonderful
    Foresight Institute
    Future Current
    FuturePundit
    grailsearch.org
    green light go
    HumanPlus
    In Search of Enlightenment
    Marginal Revolution
    Maximum Life Foundation Blog
    Metamagician and the Hellfire Club
    Metamodern
    Methuselah Foundation Blog
    Mises Economics Blog
    Ouroboros
    Overcoming Bias
    Pimm - Partial immortalization
    Responsible Nanotechnology
    ScienceBlogs
    Sentient Developments
    Singularity Hub
    Singularity Institute Blog
    Sonia Arrison
    The Speculist
    The Technological Citizen

    Archives (Monthly)

    February 2010
    January 2010
    December 2009
    November 2009
    October 2009
    September 2009
    August 2009
    July 2009
    June 2009
    May 2009
    April 2009
    March 2009
    February 2009
    January 2009
    December 2008
    November 2008
    October 2008
    September 2008
    August 2008
    July 2008
    June 2008
    May 2008
    April 2008
    March 2008
    February 2008
    January 2008
    December 2007
    November 2007
    October 2007
    September 2007
    August 2007
    July 2007
    June 2007
    May 2007
    April 2007
    March 2007
    February 2007
    January 2007
    December 2006
    November 2006
    October 2006
    September 2006
    August 2006
    July 2006
    June 2006
    May 2006
    April 2006
    March 2006
    February 2006
    January 2006
    December 2005
    November 2005
    October 2005
    September 2005
    August 2005
    July 2005
    June 2005
    May 2005
    April 2005
    March 2005
    February 2005
    January 2005
    December 2004
    November 2004
    October 2004
    September 2004
    August 2004
    July 2004
    June 2004
    May 2004
    April 2004
    March 2004
    February 2004
    January 2004

    Creative Commons

    Creative Commons License

    Fight Aging! is published under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license. In short, this means that you are encouraged to republish and rewrite Fight Aging! content in any way you see fit, the only requirements being that you (a) link to the original, (b) attribute the author, and (c) attribute Fight Aging!.

  • Thursday, February 5, 2004

    Bootstrapping Towards Radical Life Extension

    "Radical life extension" means different things to different people, whether engineering a healthy life span of 150 years, 500 years or 1000 or more. I think that we can all agree that it implies a far longer healthy life span than can currently be attained, or even attained in the near future. Radical life extension implies the need for radical improvements in medicine, biogerontology and our understanding of the biochemical, genetic mechanisms of aging.

    Radical life extension is not unbelieveable, or obviously unattainable, however. We can conceive of a car, lovingly maintained and supplied with ample spare parts, lasting for a century or more. It would require a great deal of effort, but it is not impossible. Similarly, we can suggest general methodologies by which the healthy human life span could be greatly extended. You can always buy a new car, but you can't buy a new self.

    Bootstrapping, the title of this little piece, is one of the assumptions taken for granted in most discussions about healthy life extension. This assumption been examined ad nauseum in past decades of transhumanism and life extensionist writing, and so is mostly skipped over or referred to in passing in more modern pieces.

    (See Closing in on the Cure for Death by Aubrey de Grey at the Longevity Meme for an example of this in action).

    We need to give this bootstrapping idea more prominence again. A lot of newcomers are finding their way to healthy life extension in these times of advancing medical science. They need to be shown the dream that motivates us. The promise of longer, healthier lives is in the air, and bootstrapping explains how we can realistically work towards living to see the medical technologies of radical life extension. (Whatever they may turn out to be; the smart money is currently betting on medical nanotechnology, or nanomedicine, expected to arrive somewhere in the middle part of the 21st century).

    The future is bright - if research is allowed to continue unimpeded by restrictive legislation - but we have to face up to the fact that scientists don't currently know how to greatly extend the healthy human life span. The best we can do right now is to live a healthy life in the hopes of becoming a centenarian. Calorie restriction (eating fewer calories, while still obtaining the necessary nutrients) has been shown to extend healthy life span, but it does not appear to be able to give you more than 20 extra years at most. Of course, your years will be very healthy, but many of us feel that dying at the end of it rather defeats the point! Why be satisfied by 20 extra years when we could be working to do better than that?

    This is where the bootstrapping takes starts to take off, in theory at least. The extra healthy life we gain for ourselves through a healthy lifestyle and calorie restriction can be used to support, fund and advocate research to extend the healthy human lifespan. At the moment, this means:

    - participating in the fight against cancer, heart disease and Alzheimer's
    - supporting the Methuselah Mouse Prize
    - pushing for more funding for aging and real anti-aging research
    - fighting political attempts to ban medical research
    - supporting research into stem cells, therapeutic cloning and regenerative medicine

    In my opinion, the next wave of medical technologies that will prolong healthy lifespan will be based on regenerative medicine. If we, as a society, can successfully fund and support regenerative medicine, we will probably be able to cure most age-related damage to our bodies two decades from now. We will be able to repair diseases, replace injured tissue, and grow new organs for transplant from our own stem cells as needed. This is not pie in the sky science: the first steps have already been demonstrated in labs around the world. Regenerative medicine and stem cell medicine represents a first crucial level of control over the material and processes of our bodies.

    If regenerative medicine can give us 30 extra years of healthy life, then we will have time to develop working medical nanotechnology - it will be 2050 already! While regenerative medicine is largely a matter of manipulating existing proteins, genes and cellular mechanisms to heal, nanomedicine promises to use tiny machines to do all that far more efficiently and with greater degrees of control and effectiveness.

    Beyond nanomedicine...well, nanomedicine will give us many healthy years to think about what comes next.

    This, in a nutshell, is the bootstrapping process: extending healthy life span faster than we age. It's a realistic goal for modern science. Not an easy goal, but a realistic one. It will take a great deal of funding and time, far more than is currently being applied to medicine and the science of aging. This is why we advocate and speak up: even us younger folk only have a few decades in which to make sure that the right fields of science take off. This is why we have research prizes, life extension organizations, advocates and debates. We are being presented with - literally - the chance of a lifetime, and we must rise to meet the challenge!

    Posted by Reason

     
    Share |

    Posted by: Reason at February 6, 2004 5:04 PM

    This item from the trackback is pretty interesting, as Phil points out:

    http://www.speculist.com/archives/000637.html

    Reason
    Founder, Longevity Meme

    [Posted by: Reason at February 6, 2004 5:04 PM]

    Posted by: John Titor at July 15, 2004 8:46 AM

    The bootstrapping process that enables longer lifespans to those that gain a few years today will only work if people manage to restart and maintain and improve civilization as people of today know it.

    The first obstacle to this will be the shortage of energy. Oil prizes will more than triple before alternative sources of oil and energy will be economical. You should remember that the military might of the seafaring people in the mediterranean and the vikings of Greenland collapsed when their source of power, the trees, were used and gone.

    Energy is the key, and as more of the world becomes "civilized", conflicts caused by the flow of money and energy will become more frequent.

    The War on Aging cannot continue while other wars are being fought.

    [Posted by: John Titor at July 15, 2004 8:46 AM]

    Posted by: Reason at July 15, 2004 10:16 AM

    Malthusianism is a bankrupt argument - especially in regard to energy. Sunlight alone could be used to power a civilization many times the size of ours.

    More than 100,000 people die every day due to aging, far more than any war. You can't wave vague, speculative flags about the future in order to postpone attempts to cure aging.

    [Posted by: Reason at July 15, 2004 10:16 AM]

    Posted by: james e brown at January 25, 2006 5:29 PM

    I would like to know if there are intellectuals on this planet that are independently wealthy and powerful who are able get all, do all, enjoy all, who can control election outcomes due to there influence and wealth without anyone suspecting them of this. As well as controlling armies and other powerful people beneath them in status because of there intelligence, wealth and position. Because of all this and other factors they may vary well live for-ever in good health, wealth and power because of scientific connections. They may even have first pick on any all things of pleasure and fun and state of the art new surgeries, medicines, medications and drugs.

    [Posted by: james e brown at January 25, 2006 5:29 PM]

    Posted by: Reason at January 25, 2006 5:56 PM

    The world doesn't work that way James - there are no conspiracies, science can't be kept secret, and no desired product fails to fall in price. Either we all win or no-one does.

    [Posted by: Reason at January 25, 2006 5:56 PM]

    Posted by: james e brown at January 25, 2006 6:08 PM

    If there are others out there some where in time and space.
    Maybe they who or what ever they may or may be have not yet obliterated themselves by now. It’s possible that we animal humans have wiped our selves out many times in the passed before and we just been lucky and made it back over and over again somehow. Maybe these ufo’s or what ever they are may find our D.N.A. floating around a black hole in space some time in the future. That is if anything is left after this atom bomb stage they may of gone through and where going through has ended. That may by the reason why where alone in our near universe as far as we know. They wiped them selves out long ago and there is no one out there any more at all. It’s bad enough that space junk may cause our demise let alone, space asteroid and or meteors of some kind.

    [Posted by: james e brown at January 25, 2006 6:08 PM]

    Posted by: james e brown at January 25, 2006 6:21 PM

    There is a lot of room out there in space and time, maybe we can get out there in time for the sake of all life on this planet.

    [Posted by: james e brown at January 25, 2006 6:21 PM]

    Posted by: megapotamus at February 3, 2006 8:06 AM

    Okay James, I'm not sure how germane that is but as long as the subject is broached... Not a few folks have postulated that ultimate self destruction is the reason we, to date, find ourselves alone in the universe, why we have yet to detect an alien world's Nick at Nite wafting over us but I have another, less bleak, possibility; that electromagnetic communications become either obsolete or advance so that they are carried in variations of the spectrum so subtle (that's how the usable spectrum has increased for us) that we can not, today, detect them.

    [Posted by: megapotamus at February 3, 2006 8:06 AM]

    Posted by: Russell at November 24, 2006 7:03 AM

    I am fascinated by this topic. Although I am almost 50 years old, most people are shocked when I tell them my age, because they think that I’m in my early 30’s.

    How I did it? Well, everything in moderation, including moderation. Quality over quantity. Avoid bad people and situations if possible. Lots of peace and quiet. Vipassana meditation. A divorce, many decades ago, from mainstream mass media, and its power of suggestion. Staying single, as opposed to marriage. Trying to be a better person. Education every day of your life. Walking 4 miles every day. Ayahuasca-based shamanism. tantra-like sex and love, leading to a kundalini rising. Love of animals, children, and all other people in a platonic way. Lots of humor.

    [Posted by: Russell at November 24, 2006 7:03 AM]

    Posted by: nanohelix at March 4, 2008 9:38 AM

    Once stem cell therapy is a succes, will it not by itself be sufficient to attain enormously extended lifespans? Will we still require nanomedicine to reach the final frontier of indefinite lifespan?

    Is it not the case that if adult stem cell therapy succeeds then it might be possible to transdifferentiate patient's own stem cells to produce neurorns, glia, beta islet cells,cardiomyocytes etc and transplant them to the injured site. This procedure could be repeated again and again as need arises. Is such a scenario possible or do stem cells have their own limitatioms in this respect?

    [Posted by: nanohelix at March 4, 2008 9:38 AM]

    Posted by: Reason at March 4, 2008 1:11 PM

    Nanohelix: thoughts on that topic here:

    http://www.fightaging.org/archives/001126.php

    [Posted by: Reason at March 4, 2008 1:11 PM]

    Post a comment; thoughtful, considered opinions are valued. Please note that comments incorporating ad hominem attacks, advertising, and other forms of inappropriate behavior are likely to be deleted.










    Remember personal info?