"We are on the verge of a revolution in medicine: understanding, treating, and ultimately preventing the causes of degenerative aging. But medical revolutions only happen if we all stand up in support of funding and research. We did it for cancer. We're doing it for Alzheimer's. We can do it for aging - and create an era of longer, healthier lives!"

  
Search

Required Reading
Activism and Advocacy
Calorie Restriction
The Community, Visualized
Cryonics
Envisaging a World Without the FDA
Healthy Life Extension Explained
Introductory Articles
Longevity Meme Newsletter
The Most Important Debate
Stem Cells, Regenerative Medicine
SENS, Negligible Senescence
What is Anti-Aging?

Initiatives
Biogerontology Research Foundation
LifeStar Institute
Methuselah Foundation
Mprize for Longevity Research
Science Against Aging (Translate)
SENS Foundation

On the Causes of Aging
Accumulating AGEs
The Failing Immune System
Junk in the Lysosome
Mitochondrial Free Radicals
Senescent Cells
Other Causes of Aging

Benefiting From Medical Research
How to Read Scientific Research
Researching Therapies and Clinical Trials

Objections Answered
Boredom
Inequality and Economics
Overpopulation
Stagnation
Being Older for Longer?
What About Retirement?

Recent Entries

  • Subtleties of Calorie Restriction and Evolution
  • Signs of the Times: Engineered Organs in the Popular Press
  • Genescient Envisioned as Sirtris++
  • Help the Immortality Institute Fund Research Into Laser Ablation of Lipofuscin
  • The Singularity's Time in the Sun
  • Deciphering the Machine By Pulling Out Cogs and Flipping Switches
  • Scientific American on Alzheimer's Research
  • The Downward Spiral
  • A Male-Only Longevity Mutation in Mice
  • Cryonics and Economic Incentives
  • Bid in a Charity Auction For a Portrait of Aubrey de Grey
  • You Have To Do Better Than That
  • Failing Memory and the Failing Immune System: Reversible?
  • A New Spanner to Throw Into the Works of Cancer
  • The Benefits of Falling Costs in Biotechnology
  • SENS 4: Early Registration and Abstract Submission Deadline Approaches
  • A Cautionary Tale and a Point of Principle
  • On the 2009 AGE Conference
  • An Update on Decellularization / Recellularization
  • Accumulating Mitochondrial DNA Damage: More Harm or Less Repair?

    Blogs of Interest
    Accelerating Future
    Ageing Research
    Anti-Ageing Research
    Alcor News
    Al Fin Longevity
    April's CR Diary
    Andart
    Biosingularity
    CRON Diary
    Cryonics Society
    Depressed Metabolism
    Distributed Republic
    Ethical Technology Blog
    Existence is Wonderful
    Future Current
    FuturePundit
    grailsearch.org
    green light go
    In Search of Enlightenment
    Longevity Science
    Marginal Revolution
    Metamagician and the Hellfire Club
    Metamodern
    Methuselah Foundation Blog
    Mises Economics Blog
    Nanodot
    Ouroboros
    Overcoming Bias
    Pimm - Partial immortalization
    Responsible Nanotechnology
    ScienceBlogs
    Sentient Developments
    Singularity Hub
    Singularity Institute Blog
    The Loom
    The Speculist
    Transumanar

    Archives (Monthly)

    July 2009
    June 2009
    May 2009
    April 2009
    March 2009
    February 2009
    January 2009
    December 2008
    November 2008
    October 2008
    September 2008
    August 2008
    July 2008
    June 2008
    May 2008
    April 2008
    March 2008
    February 2008
    January 2008
    December 2007
    November 2007
    October 2007
    September 2007
    August 2007
    July 2007
    June 2007
    May 2007
    April 2007
    March 2007
    February 2007
    January 2007
    December 2006
    November 2006
    October 2006
    September 2006
    August 2006
    July 2006
    June 2006
    May 2006
    April 2006
    March 2006
    February 2006
    January 2006
    December 2005
    November 2005
    October 2005
    September 2005
    August 2005
    July 2005
    June 2005
    May 2005
    April 2005
    March 2005
    February 2005
    January 2005
    December 2004
    November 2004
    October 2004
    September 2004
    August 2004
    July 2004
    June 2004
    May 2004
    April 2004
    March 2004
    February 2004
    January 2004

    Creative Commons License
    Attribution, noncommercial, no derivative works. Play nice.

  • Sunday, October 3, 2004

    How to Fund a $62.5 Million Research Prize

    Now that we've established a research prize with the final value of $62.5 million would likely generate on the order of $1 billion in research investments over the course of a decade, and that $1 billion is projected to be sufficient to develop the necessary medical breakthroughs for radical life extension, we can look at what is now the big, important question: how do we obtain $62.5 million?

    The $10 million Ansari X Prize doesn't have $10 million in the bank. The X Prize Foundation relies on a different strategy to obtain the money:

    The $10 million is backed by a "hole-in-one" insurance policy, similar to those taken out by golf courses for tournaments. In recent years, the premiums have been paid from contributions made by two Iranian-born telecom entrepreneurs: Anousheh Ansari and her brother-in-law, Amir Ansari. Both have said they would someday want to take spaceflights themselves.

    "I'm on cloud nine," Anousheh Ansari said Sunday.

    The insurance company may not be so enthusiastic. Diamandis declined to name the company, but the St. Louis Post-Dispatch identified it as an insurance practice group within Bermuda-based XL Capital.

    The insurance company has a representative on the judging team, and Diamandis was confident that there would be no snags, thanks to the "tremendous amount of advance work done with the insurance company and the judges and Scaled [Composites]."

    The premiums are no doubt hefty and will become even higher for future research prizes if this one is won, as is looking likely. Examine your own insurance premiums and coverage to get some idea of the figures we would be talking about. Still, this is a good strategy for a prize that can involves a particular deadline and clearly defined event, like the X Prize. It allows you to name a big attractive sum of money at the outset and reduces the funding problems to paying insurance premiums.

    Medical research is a different proposition, however, and the Methuselah Mouse Prize is structured as a rolling contest. Competing teams win a fraction of the total purse with each advance in healthy life span in laboratory mice. The larger the advance, the more they win.

    In theory, one could step up with a $62.5 million prize for Aubrey de Grey's proposed first goal in mouse longevity:

    The degree of control that I consider sufficient is the ability to take a cohort of mice of a strain whose normal life expectancy is three years, do nothing to them until they are two years old, and get them to live an average of three more years, i.e. tripling their remaining life expectancy.

    Reaching this goal would take most of a decade, however, and the cost is beyond the reach of all but the largest organizations. An organization big enough to throw $1 billion at the problem - or even a sizeable fraction of that amount - is not going to be influenced into doing so by a mere $62.5 million. Large organizations are risk averse; they don't enter the game until the risky process of basic research is done and in the bag. When Merck and Pfizer start working on radical life extension treatments, we will have essentially already won - but that day is still a long way away.

    A medical research prize like the Methuselah Mouse Prize is really aimed at energizing smaller organizations and groups - ones that can collaborate and compete to make small gains that add up over time. If each small gain is rewarded, then the incentives favor the sort of organizations we see doing the riskier, more speculative work in basic medical research.

    So where do we get that $62.5 million? If we take a look at a PDF chart of donations to the largest US charities in 2000, or a much more in-depth report for 2003 from the NonProfit Times, you can see that the largest organizations take in many times this amount in a single year. So it's quite possible to take the traditional path of growing a nonprofit organization around the job of gathering donations for the Methuselah Mouse Prize, and this is the current strategy followed by the Methuselah Foundation.

    If there is sufficient interest, I can elaborate on nonprofit strategies for raising large sums of money - and the strategies of the Methuselah Foundation - in a future post.

    Posted by Reason at October 3, 2004 5:45 PM | TrackBack (2)

    Posted by: dave kekich at October 4, 2004 9:35 AM

    Many thanks for your insights Reason. I wish you would have attended our Maximum Life Foundation brainstorm session on Sept 18th. Aubrey was here along with about 10 creative marketing and venture capital people.

    We spent the day brainstorming ways to raise the funds needed to complete the Methuselah Project (which was spawned at our first scientific brainstorm session in June, 2000).

    The session was extremely productive and will lead to more. Bruce Klein provided us with and audio feed at http://www.imminst.org/audio/. Please feel free to contact me at 310-265-8644 to discuss and to plan the next one.

    Thanks,
    Dave

    [Posted by: dave kekich at October 4, 2004 9:35 AM]

    Post a comment; thoughtful, considered opinions are valued. Please note that comments incorporating ad hominem attacks, advertising and other forms of inappropriate behavior are likely to be deleted.










    Remember personal info?