Leon Kass Back To Work
Permalink | View Comments (2) | Post Comment | Posted by Reason

Chris Mooney notes that Leon Kass - our favorite anti-progress mystic - is back to work, attempting to justify restrictions on medical research that could lead to longer, healthier lives.

Apparently he was instrumental in the president's ultimate decision on this matter, and now he's risen to defend a policy in shreds. Kass presents a reasoned case, but it falls apart in several places.

...

Ironically, though, Kass does invoke scientific opinion when it suits his argument, writing: "It is cruel to suggest that stem-cell-based therapies are 'at our fingertips' when our best scientists have made it clear that it will be at least several decades before anyone's disease or disability might be cured by this means." Well, yeah, but our best scientists are also fed up with Bush's policy and don't think it's adequate at all.

Leon Kass is a very smart guy and capable of subtle and nuanced argument. But alas, I don't find his latest defense of the Bush policy at all convincing, because it simply fails to listen to science except out of convenience.

Kass is just doing the job he was appointed to do - rubber stamp US administration restrictions on medical research.

The Bioethics Council, appointed by President Bush, is ostensibly an intellectual group that provides an "adequate moral and ethical lens through which to view particular developments in their proper scope and depth." In practice, the council is stacked with members who are strongly opposed - mostly on religious grounds - to embryonic stem cell research and therapeutic cloning, both vital to the developing field of regenerative medicine. The chairman, Leon Kass, has frequently gone on record to state his opposition to any research that would extend the healthy human life span.

The Bioethics Council is used by the current US administration to provide justification for anti-research policies that have already caused enormous damage to medical research. Despite the designed bias in the council against stem cell and therapeutic cloning research, the case for research is so strong that the council was not able to condemn it in their most recent official report, "Monitoring Stem Cell Research."

Comments

If these pricks are so convinced that death is a doorway into another universe, why are they so afraid to go through it themselves?

Its time for these pricks to either put up or shut up.

Posted by: Kurt at October 8, 2004 4:55 PM

I just read Olshansky's bio on the crossroads website. Not only is this guy not a biologist, he doesn't even have a technical backgroud. This guy is full of it.

One of the problems with government funded research is that it is based on bureaucracy and results in very little real accomplishment. Think NASA and the fusion program. The recent work of Burt Rutan and co. clearly demonstrates that real progress in any scientific endevour will only come from the private side. Olshansky (who is not technical) makes this very clear.

Technically speaking, what Olshansky has to say is gibberish, and the people working on SENS are right to ignore him.

Posted by: Kurt at October 10, 2004 3:12 PM
Post a comment; thoughtful, considered opinions are valued. Please note that comments incorporating ad hominem attacks, advertising, and other forms of inappropriate behavior are likely to be deleted.









Remember personal info?






First Steps

The Causes of Aging

Archives and Feeds

Required Reading

Initiatives

Benefiting from Medical Research

Objections Answered

Blogs of Interest

Creative Commons

  • All of Fight Aging!, with the exception of the introductory articles, is published under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license. In short, this means that you are encouraged to republish and rewrite Creative Commons licensed Fight Aging! content in any way you see fit, the only requirements being that you (a) link to the original, (b) attribute the author, and (c) attribute Fight Aging!.