"We are on the verge of a revolution in medicine: understanding, treating, and ultimately preventing the causes of degenerative aging. But medical revolutions only happen if we all stand up in support of funding and research. We did it for cancer. We're doing it for Alzheimer's. We can do it for aging - and create an era of longer, healthier lives!"

Email Contact
reason -at- fightaging -dot- org

  
Search

The Causes of Aging
Accumulating AGEs
Buildup of Amyloid Between Cells
The Failing Immune System
Declining Lysosomal Function
Mitochondrial DNA Damage
Senescent Cells
Other Causes of Aging

Required Reading
Calorie Restriction
The Community, Visualized
Cryonics
Engineered Negligible Senescence
Envisaging a World Without the FDA
Healthy Life Extension Explained
Introductory Articles
Longevity Meme Newsletter
The Odds of Human Longevity Mutations
The Need For Activism and Advocacy
Stem Cells, Regenerative Medicine
Twelve Ways to Extend Mouse Life Span
The Vital Debate in Aging Research
What is Anti-Aging?

Initiatives
Biogerontology Research Foundation
Campaign Against Aging
Campaign for Aging Research
LifeStar Institute
Immortality Institute
Maximum Life Foundation
Methuselah Foundation
Mprize for Longevity Research
Science Against Aging (Translate)
SENS Foundation

Benefiting From Medical Research
How to Read Scientific Research
Researching Therapies and Clinical Trials

Objections Answered
Boredom
Inequality and Economics
Overpopulation
Stagnation
Being Older for Longer?
What About Retirement?

Recent Entries

  • The Conservative View of Progress in Applied Cancer Research
  • More on Stem Cell Technology and the Rise of Medical Tourism
  • Resting Metabolic Rate and Aging, Another of Metabolism's Complexities
  • Capabilities in Stem Cell Science Are Advancing Rapidly
  • Incentives and Cryonics
  • Videos From the Foresight 2010 Conference
  • A Steady Flow of New Donors at the Methuselah Foundation
  • Manipulating Fat in the Context of Slowing Aging
  • On Medical Tourism For Stem Cell Therapies
  • Cells, Hearts, and Brains
  • Rapamycin Research Rolls Onward
  • Reversing Blindness in Retinitis Pigmentosa With Stem Cells
  • The Body Does Work to Break Down Damaging Aggregates
  • A Few Cancer Stem Cell Articles
  • The Latest on Mitochondrial Uncoupling
  • Longevity Research at the Science Network
  • Journalists Are In the Business of Gathering Eyeballs, Not Truth
  • @ging, a New Aging Science Blog
  • Redefining Bionics Again
  • Encouraging Transparency in Life Science Fundraising

    Blogs of Interest
    @ging
    Accelerating Future
    Ageing Research
    Alcor News
    Al Fin Longevity
    April's CR Diary
    Andart
    Biology of Aging
    Biosingularity
    CRON Diary
    Cryonics Society
    Depressed Metabolism
    Distributed Republic
    Ethical Technology Blog
    Existence is Wonderful
    Foresight Institute
    Future Current
    FuturePundit
    grailsearch.org
    green light go
    HumanPlus
    In Search of Enlightenment
    Marginal Revolution
    Maximum Life Foundation Blog
    Metamagician and the Hellfire Club
    Metamodern
    Methuselah Foundation Blog
    Mises Economics Blog
    Ouroboros
    Overcoming Bias
    Pimm - Partial immortalization
    Responsible Nanotechnology
    ScienceBlogs
    Sentient Developments
    Singularity Hub
    Singularity Institute Blog
    Sonia Arrison
    The Speculist
    The Technological Citizen

    Archives (Monthly)

    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010
    December 2009
    November 2009
    October 2009
    September 2009
    August 2009
    July 2009
    June 2009
    May 2009
    April 2009
    March 2009
    February 2009
    January 2009
    December 2008
    November 2008
    October 2008
    September 2008
    August 2008
    July 2008
    June 2008
    May 2008
    April 2008
    March 2008
    February 2008
    January 2008
    December 2007
    November 2007
    October 2007
    September 2007
    August 2007
    July 2007
    June 2007
    May 2007
    April 2007
    March 2007
    February 2007
    January 2007
    December 2006
    November 2006
    October 2006
    September 2006
    August 2006
    July 2006
    June 2006
    May 2006
    April 2006
    March 2006
    February 2006
    January 2006
    December 2005
    November 2005
    October 2005
    September 2005
    August 2005
    July 2005
    June 2005
    May 2005
    April 2005
    March 2005
    February 2005
    January 2005
    December 2004
    November 2004
    October 2004
    September 2004
    August 2004
    July 2004
    June 2004
    May 2004
    April 2004
    March 2004
    February 2004
    January 2004

    Creative Commons

    Creative Commons License

    Fight Aging! is published under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license. In short, this means that you are encouraged to republish and rewrite Fight Aging! content in any way you see fit, the only requirements being that you (a) link to the original, (b) attribute the author, and (c) attribute Fight Aging!.

  • Friday, November 12, 2004

    More On Advertising - More Advertising?

    As long-time readers will know, all advertising revenue from Fight Aging! and the Longevity Meme is donated to the Methuselah Foundation. Currently, this money goes to help build the Methuselah Mouse Prize fund.

    Our latest sponsor (you'll see their banners starting next week) is asking about other opportunities for advertising beyond the standard header banner you no doubt see at the top of this page. Examples included paid placement in the Resources section of the Longevity Meme, inclusion of links to sponsor articles, the inclusion of advertisments in the Longevity Meme newsletter and so forth.

    I think that any sort of paid placement is a bad thing - it always has been a bad thing in search engines, for example. It subverts the useful original purpose of the places in which it occurs. Similarly, there is such a thing as too much advertising for a given website. However, inclusion of modestly sized text ads in the Longevity Meme newsletter seems like a reasonable step - assuming that the subscribers are on board with such a change. What else could fall into that category without stepping over the line?

    I'm throwing this open to the gallery - what do you folks think? Ultimately, these sites are here for your benefit, so your suggestions and ideas are welcome.

    Posted by Reason

     
    Share |

    Posted by: Jay Fox at November 13, 2004 3:00 AM

    In general, I don't mind ads and sponsored links as long as they are not annoying (e.g. rapidly flashing reds and yellows), and as long as they are relevant (I've seen a lot of sponsored links that are completely irrelevant to the web page or search I had requested), then they're not that bad a thing. While I don't like pushy marketing, I also understand the need for at least some modest passive marketing.

    Besides, some of the companies you already link to, such as AOR and the LEF, may be hard to find on accident if one is not looking for them, so it's nice to have the links. And the money is going to a good cause, so that helps make it more palatable as well.

    But I have decent bandwidth, so I'm not as affected as people on dialup.

    [Posted by: Jay Fox at November 13, 2004 3:00 AM]

    Posted by: Kip Werking at November 13, 2004 9:06 AM

    I agree with Jay. I don't like ads that: move, flash, make sounds, or pop up. But I have no problem with Google text-only ads.

    I would love to see more advertising on this site if it (i) supports the blog, (ii) supports the Methuselah Mouse Prize, and/or (iii) supports companies like AOL and LEF. These latter promote "vitamin milkshakes" but also remain committed to life extension--whether that is accomplished through milkshakes or gene therapy.

    [Posted by: Kip Werking at November 13, 2004 9:06 AM]

    Posted by: David Gobel at November 13, 2004 2:45 PM

    As long as I know a) that the money is truly going to support the prize and b) that the advertisers are vetted to be of interest to the readership and are not selling junk that promises to help you lose weight by eating eclairs as fast as you can, I'm for it. Thus, you would need to continue to exercise "editorial control" of the sponsors. This would be appreciated by the viewers and would make the placement of sponsor's info of much greater value and cachet - thus increasing the value proposition to the sponsor as well.

    [Posted by: David Gobel at November 13, 2004 2:45 PM]

    Posted by: Reason at November 13, 2004 4:46 PM

    As the guy who is picking up the checks, one would hope you are noticing the monies coming in to the prize fund :)

    [Posted by: Reason at November 13, 2004 4:46 PM]

    Posted by: David Gobel at November 13, 2004 8:06 PM

    Certainly the checks are coming in and they go straight to the prize fund :-) I was answering your question as a civilian - not wearing my Foundation hat.

    [Posted by: David Gobel at November 13, 2004 8:06 PM]

    Posted by: Guy Bryant at November 15, 2004 7:05 AM

    I agree with most of the comments concerning the advertising. If it is not annoying, is relavent and not just hype then I say go for it. I like the fact that revenues would support the Methuselah Mouse Prize fund.

    [Posted by: Guy Bryant at November 15, 2004 7:05 AM]

    Post a comment; thoughtful, considered opinions are valued. Please note that comments incorporating ad hominem attacks, advertising, and other forms of inappropriate behavior are likely to be deleted.










    Remember personal info?