"We are on the verge of a revolution in medicine: understanding, treating, and ultimately preventing the causes of degenerative aging. But medical revolutions only happen if we all stand up in support of funding and research. We did it for cancer. We're doing it for Alzheimer's. We can do it for aging - and create an era of longer, healthier lives!"

  
Search

Required Reading
Activism and Advocacy
Calorie Restriction
The Community, Visualized
Cryonics
Envisaging a World Without the FDA
Healthy Life Extension Explained
Introductory Articles
Longevity Meme Newsletter
The Most Important Debate
Stem Cells, Regenerative Medicine
SENS, Negligible Senescence
What is Anti-Aging?

Initiatives
Biogerontology Research Foundation
LifeStar Institute
Methuselah Foundation
Mprize for Longevity Research
Science Against Aging (Translate)
SENS Foundation

On the Causes of Aging
Accumulating AGEs
The Failing Immune System
Junk in the Lysosome
Mitochondrial Free Radicals
Senescent Cells
Other Causes of Aging

Benefiting From Medical Research
How to Read Scientific Research
Researching Therapies and Clinical Trials

Objections Answered
Boredom
Inequality and Economics
Overpopulation
Stagnation
Being Older for Longer?
What About Retirement?

Recent Entries

  • Subtleties of Calorie Restriction and Evolution
  • Signs of the Times: Engineered Organs in the Popular Press
  • Genescient Envisioned as Sirtris++
  • Help the Immortality Institute Fund Research Into Laser Ablation of Lipofuscin
  • The Singularity's Time in the Sun
  • Deciphering the Machine By Pulling Out Cogs and Flipping Switches
  • Scientific American on Alzheimer's Research
  • The Downward Spiral
  • A Male-Only Longevity Mutation in Mice
  • Cryonics and Economic Incentives
  • Bid in a Charity Auction For a Portrait of Aubrey de Grey
  • You Have To Do Better Than That
  • Failing Memory and the Failing Immune System: Reversible?
  • A New Spanner to Throw Into the Works of Cancer
  • The Benefits of Falling Costs in Biotechnology
  • SENS 4: Early Registration and Abstract Submission Deadline Approaches
  • A Cautionary Tale and a Point of Principle
  • On the 2009 AGE Conference
  • An Update on Decellularization / Recellularization
  • Accumulating Mitochondrial DNA Damage: More Harm or Less Repair?

    Blogs of Interest
    Accelerating Future
    Ageing Research
    Anti-Ageing Research
    Alcor News
    Al Fin Longevity
    April's CR Diary
    Andart
    Biosingularity
    CRON Diary
    Cryonics Society
    Depressed Metabolism
    Distributed Republic
    Ethical Technology Blog
    Existence is Wonderful
    Future Current
    FuturePundit
    grailsearch.org
    green light go
    In Search of Enlightenment
    Longevity Science
    Marginal Revolution
    Metamagician and the Hellfire Club
    Metamodern
    Methuselah Foundation Blog
    Mises Economics Blog
    Nanodot
    Ouroboros
    Overcoming Bias
    Pimm - Partial immortalization
    Responsible Nanotechnology
    ScienceBlogs
    Sentient Developments
    Singularity Hub
    Singularity Institute Blog
    The Loom
    The Speculist
    Transumanar

    Archives (Monthly)

    July 2009
    June 2009
    May 2009
    April 2009
    March 2009
    February 2009
    January 2009
    December 2008
    November 2008
    October 2008
    September 2008
    August 2008
    July 2008
    June 2008
    May 2008
    April 2008
    March 2008
    February 2008
    January 2008
    December 2007
    November 2007
    October 2007
    September 2007
    August 2007
    July 2007
    June 2007
    May 2007
    April 2007
    March 2007
    February 2007
    January 2007
    December 2006
    November 2006
    October 2006
    September 2006
    August 2006
    July 2006
    June 2006
    May 2006
    April 2006
    March 2006
    February 2006
    January 2006
    December 2005
    November 2005
    October 2005
    September 2005
    August 2005
    July 2005
    June 2005
    May 2005
    April 2005
    March 2005
    February 2005
    January 2005
    December 2004
    November 2004
    October 2004
    September 2004
    August 2004
    July 2004
    June 2004
    May 2004
    April 2004
    March 2004
    February 2004
    January 2004

    Creative Commons License
    Attribution, noncommercial, no derivative works. Play nice.

  • Friday, October 24, 2008

    Differential Aging

    The human body is not a homogeneous mass, but rather a networked collection of very different structures and systems. Unsurprisingly, then, aging affects different tissues at different rates. This is just the same as in any engine, simple or complex: some components tend to fail due to accumulated damage more rapidly than others. For example:

    The 80-year-old Norwegian received a cornea transplant fifty years ago, a piece of tissue now 123 years old that still works today. It could be the oldest eye, or even human body part, still functioning or to have ever been in use for so long. ... He had a cornea transplanted into his right eye in 1958, from a man born in June 1885. At the time it was expected to work for only 5 years. However, Reuters report that the procedure has been in use since the early 20th century. That means there could be even older corneas out there.

    There is no profound lesson to be learned here, but this another useful example to present to people unfamiliar with the bounds of life span and survival in the natural world. If tortoises, whales, and this cornea can all manage such lengthy survival, it encourages the belief that medical research can engineer the same for human life in general. It is easier for people to accept that a goal can be accomplished based upon the evidence of a near example already in existence than in the absence of any example at all.

    Posted by Reason at October 24, 2008 6:47 PM | TrackBack (0)

    Posted by: Doug Jones at October 27, 2008 2:37 PM

    Cool, is this guy an organ donor himself? If the cornea is still in good shape, it might get passed along to another user. Makes me think of the three Fates, sharing one eye...

    Parts is parts!

    [Posted by: Doug Jones at October 27, 2008 2:37 PM]

    Posted by: John at October 27, 2008 4:25 PM

    In the preantibiotic era pneumonia was the old man"s friend. Today we have nursing homes filled with elderly who have lost memory and the will to live. Any balm that can keep one active and vital is what is desired not longevity records of the living dead.

    [Posted by: John at October 27, 2008 4:25 PM]

    Posted by: The Snob at October 27, 2008 8:08 PM

    John: My father is thinking about his next ski trip to Utah, and he is turning 70 next year. On our last trip out there in 2002, we met a fellow on the lift who was 79, looking forward to 80 because then they let you ski free. My father's diet and exercise habits are marginal at best, and he was lucky when they caught the cancer in his kidney thanks to cheap ultrasound and MRI. They got it before it spread, so now we're hoping the radiation he went through last year for his prostate is the last of it.

    His father, meanwhile, started down the cancer well in his mid 50s, and spent the last couple years of his life slowly dying in the hospital, finally going at age 59. These days that's considered pretty sad, but back then it was pretty common. It would be nice if we had better treatments for dementia and whatnot but our progress so far has paid some pretty big dividends.

    [Posted by: The Snob at October 27, 2008 8:08 PM]

    Posted by: Chris Ford at October 27, 2008 9:24 PM

    I believe that the record for longevity of human tissue is held by cancer cultures taken from 60+ year-old patients in the early 1900s. Virulent, fast-reproducing...immortal in the sense that they are still alive and reproducing in a few universities today.

    I think the record will eventually be held by a nearly ubiquitous cellular research standard - the HELA cancer cells taken in 1948 from a 63-year old black woman with uterine cancer.

    Get cancer. With any luck, people will want to keep it alive and nourish it, to study it, after you die. The tumor your body made. Immortal. Impervious to time and aging.

    [Posted by: Chris Ford at October 27, 2008 9:24 PM]

    Posted by: Nancy Reyes at October 28, 2008 3:55 PM

    Corneas don't have a blood supply...they get their nutrition from intraocular fluid. This means that they don't get attacked by the immune system.

    [Posted by: Nancy Reyes at October 28, 2008 3:55 PM]

    Post a comment; thoughtful, considered opinions are valued. Please note that comments incorporating ad hominem attacks, advertising and other forms of inappropriate behavior are likely to be deleted.










    Remember personal info?