"We are on the verge of a revolution in medicine: understanding, treating, and ultimately preventing the causes of degenerative aging. But medical revolutions only happen if we all stand up in support of funding and research. We did it for cancer. We're doing it for Alzheimer's. We can do it for aging - and create an era of longer, healthier lives!"

Email Contact
reason -at- fightaging -dot- org

  
Search

The Causes of Aging
Accumulating AGEs
Buildup of Amyloid Between Cells
The Failing Immune System
Declining Lysosomal Function
Mitochondrial DNA Damage
Senescent Cells
Other Causes of Aging

Required Reading
Calorie Restriction
The Community, Visualized
Cryonics
Engineered Negligible Senescence
Envisaging a World Without the FDA
Healthy Life Extension Explained
Introductory Articles
Longevity Meme Newsletter
The Odds of Human Longevity Mutations
The Need For Activism and Advocacy
Stem Cells, Regenerative Medicine
Twelve Ways to Extend Mouse Life Span
The Vital Debate in Aging Research
What is Anti-Aging?

Initiatives
Biogerontology Research Foundation
Campaign Against Aging
Campaign for Aging Research
LifeStar Institute
Immortality Institute
Maximum Life Foundation
Methuselah Foundation
Mprize for Longevity Research
Science Against Aging (Translate)
SENS Foundation

Benefiting From Medical Research
How to Read Scientific Research
Researching Therapies and Clinical Trials

Objections Answered
Boredom
Inequality and Economics
Overpopulation
Stagnation
Being Older for Longer?
What About Retirement?

Recent Entries

  • Looking Ahead to Mitochondrial DNA Replacement Therapies
  • Spermidine and Another Vote For Autophagy
  • Raising the Dead
  • Why Live Another 20 Years?
  • An Intriguing View of Alzheimer's Disease
  • Another Run at Making Old Stem Cells Act As Though Young
  • A Little More Heat Shock Protein Manipulation Work
  • The Layperson's View of Aging and Longevity Science
  • A Small Selection of Calorie Restriction Mimetic Drug Research
  • Reports From a Youthful Cryonics Meeting
  • Thoughts on Scientific Consensus
  • Rapamycin Longevity May Stack With Calorie Restriction Longevity
  • An Update From Sierra Sciences: Cure Aging or Die Trying
  • Statins as a Model for the Spread of Early Longevity Drugs
  • The Campaign Against Aging
  • Alternative Lengthening of Telomeres: ALT 101
  • The Prospect of Cancer Does Not Worry Me
  • A Project For 2010: 10,000 People, $1 Million For Longevity Science
  • A Message on Aging From the Science for Life Extension Foundation
  • A Defense of Programmed Aging

    Blogs of Interest
    Accelerating Future
    Ageing Research
    Alcor News
    Al Fin Longevity
    April's CR Diary
    Andart
    Biosingularity
    CRON Diary
    Cryonics Society
    Depressed Metabolism
    Distributed Republic
    Ethical Technology Blog
    Existence is Wonderful
    Foresight Institute
    Future Current
    FuturePundit
    grailsearch.org
    green light go
    HumanPlus
    In Search of Enlightenment
    Longevity Science
    Marginal Revolution
    Maximum Life Foundation Blog
    Metamagician and the Hellfire Club
    Metamodern
    Methuselah Foundation Blog
    Mises Economics Blog
    Ouroboros
    Overcoming Bias
    Pimm - Partial immortalization
    Responsible Nanotechnology
    ScienceBlogs
    Sentient Developments
    Singularity Hub
    Singularity Institute Blog
    Sonia Arrison
    The Speculist

    Archives (Monthly)

    February 2010
    January 2010
    December 2009
    November 2009
    October 2009
    September 2009
    August 2009
    July 2009
    June 2009
    May 2009
    April 2009
    March 2009
    February 2009
    January 2009
    December 2008
    November 2008
    October 2008
    September 2008
    August 2008
    July 2008
    June 2008
    May 2008
    April 2008
    March 2008
    February 2008
    January 2008
    December 2007
    November 2007
    October 2007
    September 2007
    August 2007
    July 2007
    June 2007
    May 2007
    April 2007
    March 2007
    February 2007
    January 2007
    December 2006
    November 2006
    October 2006
    September 2006
    August 2006
    July 2006
    June 2006
    May 2006
    April 2006
    March 2006
    February 2006
    January 2006
    December 2005
    November 2005
    October 2005
    September 2005
    August 2005
    July 2005
    June 2005
    May 2005
    April 2005
    March 2005
    February 2005
    January 2005
    December 2004
    November 2004
    October 2004
    September 2004
    August 2004
    July 2004
    June 2004
    May 2004
    April 2004
    March 2004
    February 2004
    January 2004

    Creative Commons

    Creative Commons License

    Fight Aging! is published under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license. In short, this means that you are encouraged to republish and rewrite Fight Aging! content in any way you see fit, the only requirements being that you (a) link to the original, (b) attribute the author, and (c) attribute Fight Aging!.

  • Monday, February 16, 2009

    Practicing Intermittent Fasting Versus Calorie Restriction

    Intermittent fasting and calorie restriction are two ways of reducing your calorie intake to obtain health benefits. Intermittant fasting might be accomplished by eating every other day, for example, while calorie restriction means eating every day, but eating less. In both cases, you have to make sure your intake of micronutrients is optimal, and your physician agrees, as for any sane dietary choice. On the scientific side:

    • Both calorie restriction and intermittent fasting produce significant health and longevity benefits in shorter-lived mammals such as mice, and at least significant health benefits in primates, including humans.

    • Far more research has been accomplished for calorie restriction, and uncertainty remains as to whether intermittent fasting is as good, definitely increases longevity, has a preferred method of practice, or whether it could even be harmful to long-term health if done incorrectly.

    • It seems plausible that calorie restriction and intermittent fasting produce their benefits in similar but different ways, based on research in lower animals, but I know of no research confirming this in mammals.

    From the point of view of actively practicing either intermittent fasting or calorie restriction, intermittent fasting is much easier for anyone whose eating habits interact with those of other people, or who is already fairly set in his ways with good dietary habits. You just don't eat some days - very simple, and few other changes to the routines of life are needed.

    Starting to practice calorie restriction, on the other hand, requires greater effort and more thought in terms of changing your diet. It's not hard, especially given the good resources available to walk you through the obvious pitfalls, but it isn't as simple as just saying "I'm not eating right now."

    So the traditional trade-off in labor and knowledge:

    • Intermittent fasting is usually much easier to introduce into your life, but has far less scientific support or a body of research to indicate the optimum methodology.

    • Calorie restriction requires more initiative to organize, but has a great weight of science backing it up, and a wide range of resources based on decades of practical experience.

    Given what I know of human nature, I suspect that intermittent fasting will rapidly become more popular than calorie restriction as soon as it accumulates a little more research in mammals than presently exists.

    Posted by Reason

     
    Share |

    Posted by: Vicki Zerbee at February 16, 2009 8:27 PM

    Scientists have known for many years that calorie restriction in the one true form of weight management that will 'work' and continue to work. The problem is that most people can not stay on a calorie restricted diet because they are hungry all the time. I look forward to learning more about intermittent fasting as the data becomes available.

    [Posted by: Vicki Zerbee at February 16, 2009 8:27 PM]

    Posted by: shegeek at February 16, 2009 11:58 PM

    I'm wondering how closely fasting is related to accompanying binging. It seems it would be too easy to rebound and lose track of total calories consumed with such a program. Steady controlled eating to keep the blood sugar levels even makes more sense to me.

    [Posted by: shegeek at February 16, 2009 11:58 PM]

    Posted by: Ralph at February 17, 2009 10:57 AM

    Is there any research about intermittent fasting (frequency, total , juice, water)? If there is any reason to believe that even some of the benefits of calorie restriction are provided by intermittent fasting, I'm interested. Are there any practicioners of intermittent fasting who blog, or otherwise document their experiences?

    [Posted by: Ralph at February 17, 2009 10:57 AM]

    Posted by: Rusty - Fitness Black Book at February 19, 2009 10:38 AM

    Intermittent Fasting has had a few recent studies. The concept was made popular by Ori Hofmekler who wrote a book on the subject, called "Warrior Diet". This is a good book, but his routine is pretty harsh.

    Brad Pilon, on the other hand has an entire book around the concept of fasting twice per week called Eat Stop Eat. I have recommended this book to people who visit my site. Hundreds have purchased this book from my recommendation and have achieved great results.

    I have been eating this way for close to a year and it has kept me around 6%-8% body fat year round.

    The Study was called: "The Metabolic Effects of Short Periods of Fasting in Humans and its Potential Application in Weight Loss"

    His book is based on the topic.

    The best study I have read regarding low calorie diets was called..."Effects of Resistance vs. Aerobic Training Combined With an 800 Calorie Liquid Diet on Lean Body Mass and Resting Metabolic Rate"

    I have a great discussion going on my blog about the subject.

    http://fitnessblackbook.com/dieting_for_fat_loss/maintain-muscle-mass-on-800-calories-per-day/

    Anyway...great conversation you have going here.

    Rusty

    [Posted by: Rusty - Fitness Black Book at February 19, 2009 10:38 AM]

    Posted by: rachel at May 28, 2009 12:35 PM

    http://rachel421-intermittentfasting.blogspot.com

    ive been experimenting with success for almost six month. i find its been to blend my approach from day to day, even week to week. my blog keeps me focused and accountable. someday ill want to look back at my stuggles. although i must say ive adapted well, and rarely stuggle with this lifestyle. its much easier than my old insulin spiking days!

    [Posted by: rachel at May 28, 2009 12:35 PM]

    Posted by: Louis Parker at June 7, 2009 7:55 PM

    The sources of the fat epidemic:
    1. Promiscuous breeding. The result is abnormally
    large and abnormally small children. In plain English - the kids are really messed up.

    2. Sitting in a chair all day long. No exercise.

    3. Cows that are fed growth hormones. This is OK
    as long as nobody eats the meat.

    [Posted by: Louis Parker at June 7, 2009 7:55 PM]

    Posted by: Greg at August 23, 2009 8:04 PM

    I haven't made this part of a regular routine, but I've done it sporadically and can definitely see the advantages. The days I do fast (very intermittently), I generally feel pretty good.

    Nice discussion.

    [Posted by: Greg at August 23, 2009 8:04 PM]

    Posted by: Anna at January 24, 2010 7:17 PM

    Intermittent fasting works for me. I've been practising it since 2006 as to have one meal a day. Calorie restriction is not a problem for me, as I just eat as usual. My appearance and health had greatly improved since then. It has however slight implication on my lifestyle, as I have to alert my friends that I eat one meal a day and if they want to eat with me, they have to reserve my diary in advance.

    [Posted by: Anna at January 24, 2010 7:17 PM]

    Post a comment; thoughtful, considered opinions are valued. Please note that comments incorporating ad hominem attacks, advertising, and other forms of inappropriate behavior are likely to be deleted.










    Remember personal info?