"We are on the verge of a revolution in medicine: understanding, treating, and ultimately preventing the causes of degenerative aging. But medical revolutions only happen if we all stand up in support of funding and research. We did it for cancer. We're doing it for Alzheimer's. We can do it for aging - and create an era of longer, healthier lives!"

Email Contact
reason -at- fightaging -dot- org

  
Search

The Causes of Aging
Accumulating AGEs
Buildup of Amyloid Between Cells
The Failing Immune System
Declining Lysosomal Function
Mitochondrial DNA Damage
Senescent Cells
Other Causes of Aging

Required Reading
Calorie Restriction
The Community, Visualized
Cryonics
Engineered Negligible Senescence
Envisaging a World Without the FDA
Healthy Life Extension Explained
Introductory Articles
Longevity Meme Newsletter
The Odds of Human Longevity Mutations
The Need For Activism and Advocacy
Stem Cells, Regenerative Medicine
Twelve Ways to Extend Mouse Life Span
The Vital Debate in Aging Research
What is Anti-Aging?

Initiatives
Biogerontology Research Foundation
Campaign Against Aging
Campaign for Aging Research
LifeStar Institute
Immortality Institute
Maximum Life Foundation
Methuselah Foundation
Mprize for Longevity Research
Science Against Aging (Translate)
SENS Foundation

Benefiting From Medical Research
How to Read Scientific Research
Researching Therapies and Clinical Trials

Objections Answered
Boredom
Inequality and Economics
Overpopulation
Stagnation
Being Older for Longer?
What About Retirement?

Recent Entries

  • The Conservative View of Progress in Applied Cancer Research
  • More on Stem Cell Technology and the Rise of Medical Tourism
  • Resting Metabolic Rate and Aging, Another of Metabolism's Complexities
  • Capabilities in Stem Cell Science Are Advancing Rapidly
  • Incentives and Cryonics
  • Videos From the Foresight 2010 Conference
  • A Steady Flow of New Donors at the Methuselah Foundation
  • Manipulating Fat in the Context of Slowing Aging
  • On Medical Tourism For Stem Cell Therapies
  • Cells, Hearts, and Brains
  • Rapamycin Research Rolls Onward
  • Reversing Blindness in Retinitis Pigmentosa With Stem Cells
  • The Body Does Work to Break Down Damaging Aggregates
  • A Few Cancer Stem Cell Articles
  • The Latest on Mitochondrial Uncoupling
  • Longevity Research at the Science Network
  • Journalists Are In the Business of Gathering Eyeballs, Not Truth
  • @ging, a New Aging Science Blog
  • Redefining Bionics Again
  • Encouraging Transparency in Life Science Fundraising

    Blogs of Interest
    @ging
    Accelerating Future
    Ageing Research
    Alcor News
    Al Fin Longevity
    April's CR Diary
    Andart
    Biology of Aging
    Biosingularity
    CRON Diary
    Cryonics Society
    Depressed Metabolism
    Distributed Republic
    Ethical Technology Blog
    Existence is Wonderful
    Foresight Institute
    Future Current
    FuturePundit
    grailsearch.org
    green light go
    HumanPlus
    In Search of Enlightenment
    Marginal Revolution
    Maximum Life Foundation Blog
    Metamagician and the Hellfire Club
    Metamodern
    Methuselah Foundation Blog
    Mises Economics Blog
    Ouroboros
    Overcoming Bias
    Pimm - Partial immortalization
    Responsible Nanotechnology
    ScienceBlogs
    Sentient Developments
    Singularity Hub
    Singularity Institute Blog
    Sonia Arrison
    The Speculist
    The Technological Citizen

    Archives (Monthly)

    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010
    December 2009
    November 2009
    October 2009
    September 2009
    August 2009
    July 2009
    June 2009
    May 2009
    April 2009
    March 2009
    February 2009
    January 2009
    December 2008
    November 2008
    October 2008
    September 2008
    August 2008
    July 2008
    June 2008
    May 2008
    April 2008
    March 2008
    February 2008
    January 2008
    December 2007
    November 2007
    October 2007
    September 2007
    August 2007
    July 2007
    June 2007
    May 2007
    April 2007
    March 2007
    February 2007
    January 2007
    December 2006
    November 2006
    October 2006
    September 2006
    August 2006
    July 2006
    June 2006
    May 2006
    April 2006
    March 2006
    February 2006
    January 2006
    December 2005
    November 2005
    October 2005
    September 2005
    August 2005
    July 2005
    June 2005
    May 2005
    April 2005
    March 2005
    February 2005
    January 2005
    December 2004
    November 2004
    October 2004
    September 2004
    August 2004
    July 2004
    June 2004
    May 2004
    April 2004
    March 2004
    February 2004
    January 2004

    Creative Commons

    Creative Commons License

    Fight Aging! is published under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license. In short, this means that you are encouraged to republish and rewrite Fight Aging! content in any way you see fit, the only requirements being that you (a) link to the original, (b) attribute the author, and (c) attribute Fight Aging!.

  • Thursday, June 4, 2009

    Accumulating Mitochondrial DNA Damage: More Harm or Less Repair?

    The mitochondrial free radical theory of aging tells us that accumulating damage to the DNA inside the mitochondria in our cells is a prominent cause of age-related degeneration. Mitochondria are powerplants, thousands to a cell swarming to turn food into the fuel chemical ATP, and their DNA, separate from the DNA in the cell's nucleus, is the blueprint for their assembly and operation. You'll find a simplified layman's explanation of the mitochondrial free radical theory of aging back in the Fight Aging! archives - there are a lot of steps and processes run awry between damaged mitochondrial DNA and the large-scale damage of aging.

    Damaged mitochondria proliferate in some cells and, like damaged factories, pollute those cell with excess reactive oxygen species (ROS) and free radicals produced as metabolic byproducts. Each damaged cell then tries to maintain itself by exporting more reactive oxygen species and free radicals from its cell membrane structures, spreading the damaging pollution far and wide in the body.

    We humans are self-repairing systems to some degree, as are the cells we are made up of. When considering an accumulation of damage in a self-repairing system, it isn't as simple as "dents and errors add up over time." Is the rate of damage changing? Is the damage causing a feedback loop that makes it more likely for more of the same damage to occur? Is the accumulation of damage actually a result of failing repair systems (i.e. ongoing damage is perfectly normal, expected, and repaired in a young individual, but some other aspect of aging causes the damage repair machinery to decline in effectiveness over the years)?

    Here's a recent paper theorizing on the repair failure scenario:

    The free radical theory of ageing states that ROS play a key role in age-related decrease in mitochondrial function via the damage of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), proteins and lipids. In the [fungus] Podospora anserina ageing is, as in other eukaryotes, associated with mtDNA instability and mitochondrial dysfunction.

    Part of the mtDNA instabilities may arise due to accumulation of ROS induced mtDNA lesions, which, as previously suggested for mammals, may be caused by an age-related decrease in base excision repair (BER). ... We report for the first time the presence of BER activities in P. anserina mitochondrial extracts. ... the increased mtDNA instability with age may be caused by decreased ability to repair mtDNA damage and hence contribute to ageing.

    Debating the exact method by which damage is happening may seem esoteric, but it does affect our expectations as to what sort of therapy would be most effective in rolling back the effects of mitochondrial DNA damage. For example, if the problem is largely a failing repair system, then a complete replacement of damaged mitochondrial DNA throughout the body - such as via protofection, demonstrated in mice four years ago - won't buy us as much time as we'd like. That new mitochondrial DNA is getting dumped into an environment that won't repairing it well, so it won't last as long.

    In this "failing self-repair" scenario, the SENS approach of moving specific crucial mitochondrial genes into the cell nucleus is much better. Do it once, and never have to worry about the problem again: it doesn't matter how ratty the mitochondrial DNA is getting because there's a backup in place that continues to provide the right blueprints. This is very illustrative of the philosophy behind the Strategies for Engineered Negligible Senescence (SENS): pick an approach that is as little affected as possible by present uncertainties in scientific knowledge. You'll notice that it matters little how and why mitochondrial DNA damage is happening, the nucleus backup strategy still fixes the problem for the long term.


    ResearchBlogging.orgSoerensen, M., Gredilla, R., Müller-Ohldach, M., Werner, A., Bohr, V., Osiewacz, H., & Stevnsner, T. (2009). A potential impact of DNA repair on ageing and lifespan in the ageing model organism Podospora anserina: Decrease in mitochondrial DNA repair activity during ageing Mechanisms of Ageing and Development DOI: 10.1016/j.mad.2009.05.003

    Posted by Reason

     
    Share |

    Post a comment; thoughtful, considered opinions are valued. Please note that comments incorporating ad hominem attacks, advertising, and other forms of inappropriate behavior are likely to be deleted.










    Remember personal info?