"We are on the verge of a revolution in medicine: understanding, treating, and ultimately preventing the causes of degenerative aging. But medical revolutions only happen if we all stand up in support of funding and research. We did it for cancer. We're doing it for Alzheimer's. We can do it for aging - and create an era of longer, healthier lives!"

Email Contact
reason -at- fightaging -dot- org

  
Search

The Causes of Aging
Accumulating AGEs
Buildup of Amyloid Between Cells
The Failing Immune System
Declining Lysosomal Function
Mitochondrial DNA Damage
Senescent Cells
Other Causes of Aging

Required Reading
Calorie Restriction
The Community, Visualized
Cryonics
Engineered Negligible Senescence
Envisaging a World Without the FDA
Healthy Life Extension Explained
Introductory Articles
Longevity Meme Newsletter
The Odds of Human Longevity Mutations
The Need For Activism and Advocacy
Stem Cells, Regenerative Medicine
Twelve Ways to Extend Mouse Life Span
The Vital Debate in Aging Research
What is Anti-Aging?

Initiatives
Biogerontology Research Foundation
Campaign Against Aging
Campaign for Aging Research
LifeStar Institute
Immortality Institute
Maximum Life Foundation
Methuselah Foundation
Mprize for Longevity Research
Science Against Aging (Translate)
SENS Foundation

Benefiting From Medical Research
How to Read Scientific Research
Researching Therapies and Clinical Trials

Objections Answered
Boredom
Inequality and Economics
Overpopulation
Stagnation
Being Older for Longer?
What About Retirement?

Recent Entries

  • The Conservative View of Progress in Applied Cancer Research
  • More on Stem Cell Technology and the Rise of Medical Tourism
  • Resting Metabolic Rate and Aging, Another of Metabolism's Complexities
  • Capabilities in Stem Cell Science Are Advancing Rapidly
  • Incentives and Cryonics
  • Videos From the Foresight 2010 Conference
  • A Steady Flow of New Donors at the Methuselah Foundation
  • Manipulating Fat in the Context of Slowing Aging
  • On Medical Tourism For Stem Cell Therapies
  • Cells, Hearts, and Brains
  • Rapamycin Research Rolls Onward
  • Reversing Blindness in Retinitis Pigmentosa With Stem Cells
  • The Body Does Work to Break Down Damaging Aggregates
  • A Few Cancer Stem Cell Articles
  • The Latest on Mitochondrial Uncoupling
  • Longevity Research at the Science Network
  • Journalists Are In the Business of Gathering Eyeballs, Not Truth
  • @ging, a New Aging Science Blog
  • Redefining Bionics Again
  • Encouraging Transparency in Life Science Fundraising

    Blogs of Interest
    @ging
    Accelerating Future
    Ageing Research
    Alcor News
    Al Fin Longevity
    April's CR Diary
    Andart
    Biology of Aging
    Biosingularity
    CRON Diary
    Cryonics Society
    Depressed Metabolism
    Distributed Republic
    Ethical Technology Blog
    Existence is Wonderful
    Foresight Institute
    Future Current
    FuturePundit
    grailsearch.org
    green light go
    HumanPlus
    In Search of Enlightenment
    Marginal Revolution
    Maximum Life Foundation Blog
    Metamagician and the Hellfire Club
    Metamodern
    Methuselah Foundation Blog
    Mises Economics Blog
    Ouroboros
    Overcoming Bias
    Pimm - Partial immortalization
    Responsible Nanotechnology
    ScienceBlogs
    Sentient Developments
    Singularity Hub
    Singularity Institute Blog
    Sonia Arrison
    The Speculist
    The Technological Citizen

    Archives (Monthly)

    March 2010
    February 2010
    January 2010
    December 2009
    November 2009
    October 2009
    September 2009
    August 2009
    July 2009
    June 2009
    May 2009
    April 2009
    March 2009
    February 2009
    January 2009
    December 2008
    November 2008
    October 2008
    September 2008
    August 2008
    July 2008
    June 2008
    May 2008
    April 2008
    March 2008
    February 2008
    January 2008
    December 2007
    November 2007
    October 2007
    September 2007
    August 2007
    July 2007
    June 2007
    May 2007
    April 2007
    March 2007
    February 2007
    January 2007
    December 2006
    November 2006
    October 2006
    September 2006
    August 2006
    July 2006
    June 2006
    May 2006
    April 2006
    March 2006
    February 2006
    January 2006
    December 2005
    November 2005
    October 2005
    September 2005
    August 2005
    July 2005
    June 2005
    May 2005
    April 2005
    March 2005
    February 2005
    January 2005
    December 2004
    November 2004
    October 2004
    September 2004
    August 2004
    July 2004
    June 2004
    May 2004
    April 2004
    March 2004
    February 2004
    January 2004

    Creative Commons

    Creative Commons License

    Fight Aging! is published under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 license. In short, this means that you are encouraged to republish and rewrite Fight Aging! content in any way you see fit, the only requirements being that you (a) link to the original, (b) attribute the author, and (c) attribute Fight Aging!.

  • Tuesday, September 29, 2009

    Interview With Aubrey de Grey at h+ Magazine

    h+ magazine, the Wired of the transhumanist community, is presently running an interview with biomedical gerontologist and longevity science advocate Aubrey de Grey on the subject of the technological singularity and its relationship with a future that includes the engineering of enhanced human longevity:

    h+: In the past five years or so, talk about the "Singularity" has become much more mainstream and acceptable, much like talk about radical life extension. Do you think that looking at futurism through the frame of the multi-faceted "Singularity" idea is helpful, or just makes matters more complicated?

    AdG: I think it's helpful. People have quite extraordinary difficulty thinking about non-linear change, and the general concept of the Singularity, especially the Kurzweil version... but really all versions, is a nicely canonical example that is as good as any to use to educate people in such thinking, even if that education consists mainly in simple repetition.

    In the case of life extension, the concept of "longevity escape velocity" (the rate at which rejuvenation technologies need to be improved in order to stave off age-related ill-health indefinitely) is similar to the Singularity (though subtly different) -- indeed, someone recently gave it the rather neat name "Methuselarity", and I have been mystified at the difficulty I have in explaining it to people -- they find it much more "ridiculous" than the near-term goal of adding 30 years of healthy life, even though in reality it's far LESS speculative.

    ...

    h+: The idea of extreme life extension is closely connected to the Singularity meme. To what extent do you think that technological progress in computers and bioinformatics is pushing along life extension research?

    AdG: Well, first of all I would like to qualify your initial statement. I think there is actually not all that much in common between life extension and accelerating change: the defeat of aging will really be just one event in the progress of technology, albeit a particularly momentous one. I therefore think that the only strong connection between the two is in the similarity of mindset and of attitudes to the future that attracts people to the two themes.

    As for your question: Bioinformatics is playing a modest but not central role in hastening progress in the biotechnological approach to postponing aging that I pursue. More general progress in developing full-blown artificial intelligence, however, may well result in a much more dramatic hastening of the defeat of aging, if computers can be created that are much smarter than we are and thus able to solve the trickier problems inherent in postponing aging much faster than we can. I therefore strongly support such research.

    As I've noted in the past, there's a lot of overlap between the artificial intelligence and longevity engineering crowds, and much of that occurs via the transhumanist community.

    Posted by Reason

     
    Share |

    Posted by: kurt9 at September 29, 2009 10:18 AM

    Yeah, I've seen more and more articles about the "singularity" in the regular media lately. I don't pay much attention to them because I don't buy into the singularity and I don't you do either. I think the main effect of advancing computer and semiconductor technology is that it makes it easier for people to do engineering work. There is software that allows you to design all kinds of stuff that you needed an engineering team to do back in the 70's or 80's. My friend in Japan designs all of his process equipment himself on his laptop, then has this small engineering company in Korea manufacture his designs. This was not possible 20 years ago. Likewise, such acceleration is occurring in biotech as well.

    This is the real performance increase that is ongoing. I agree with Aubrey that bio-information is not that central to life extension. What has to be done is lots of experiments in developing the SENS concepts. I think a lot of the work, especially in stem cell regeneration medicine, will be done for us. We have to do the parts that no one else is doing such as the mitochondrial stuff, the lysosomal aggregate removal, and other such stuff. This can only be done by experiments. I think what will bring down the cost of experiments and accelerate things is producing tissue on demand from renewable stem cells (iPS). You can crank out all of the human tissues that you need to run your experiments. Better yet, you can have something like those 96 well micro plates where you can do 96 runs at a time with 96 different compounds or tissue types. Real progress will come with accelerated, reduced cost experimentation.

    I don't buy into the AI hype at all. Progress is limited because of the rate and cost of experimentation, not because of limits on our IQs.

    [Posted by: kurt9 at September 29, 2009 10:18 AM]

    Posted by: flashprogram at September 29, 2009 12:27 PM

    "Progress is limited because of the rate and cost of experimentation, not because of limits on our IQs."-kurt9

    We've seen in things like genome sequencing, manufacturing and the search for useful compounds by testing 10,000s of thousands of chemical compounds, etc how automation can lower costs exponentially and diminish time to completion exponentially.

    If we can actually have hardware with human brain capability for 1000$ in a few decades, as some expect, and the required accompanying software. We could automate the full scientific enterprise.

    [Posted by: flashprogram at September 29, 2009 12:27 PM]

    Posted by: Michael G.R. at September 29, 2009 3:40 PM

    "Progress is limited because of the rate and cost of experimentation, not because of limits on our IQs."

    I think that's incredibly wrong. Intelligence is the most powerful tool we have.

    I suggest you take a look at this:

    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6114518772001796913#

    [Posted by: Michael G.R. at September 29, 2009 3:40 PM]

    Post a comment; thoughtful, considered opinions are valued. Please note that comments incorporating ad hominem attacks, advertising, and other forms of inappropriate behavior are likely to be deleted.










    Remember personal info?