|
Interesting how badly organised science is. You write "The authors plan to follow up this study in worms and mice." In any other environment such as the military, business or even government, such lack of planning and forethought would be very unlikely if not impossible. It would never occur to any competent manager to allow Clarke's experiments without some form of longer term planning, contingency plans, decision making trees, etc.
It could similar to this: "Our overall goal in this project is this and we choose to test this approach. If you achieve these specific results, we will allocate this funding to several next steps, which we outline in advance."
Only in science can projects be funded on no basis of rational analysis whatsoever, in a totally random fashion and without any forethough (or afterthough or any thought for that matter). It's amazing that we see any progress in science under such conditions.
[Posted by: Danila Medvedev at September 7, 2009 12:26 AM]
|