Mitochondrial Function and Cellular Senescence

The myriad mechanisms of cellular biology are a seething pool of feedback loops and interactions. Every protein that plays a role has half a dozen other roles on the side: evolution produces promiscuous reuse of every new component that arises. Thus little if anything happens in isolation in our cells, and changes produce reactions. So when we say that degeneration in aging is produced by the accumulation of a variety of forms of damage, we refer to a very complicated progress that spirals out from comparatively simple beginnings. Consider the SENS model for the causes of aging, for example. Broadly, the operation of metabolism produces waste byproducts that are not always entirely cleaned up or recycled. Separately, some important cellular components can become damaged in the course of normal operation in ways that resist the otherwise highly efficient recycling machinery. Further, evolution has adapted certain quiescent cell states used in embryonic development into a way to resist cancer. These senescent cells behave in ways that may well suppress cancer risk in the short term, but are not good at all for tissues over the long term. Separately again, some larger and more complex structures, such as the thymus or the immune system considered as a whole, become misconfigured or less useful over the course of time as an inevitable consequence of their structure and modes of operation. Even if all of their cellular components continued to work perfectly in and of themselves, some of our biological systems cannot operate well indefinitely.

These are all discrete sources of damage and gradual failure, distinct processes and harms that must be addressed separately by any suite of rejuvenation treatments. Damage doesn't accumulate in isolation, however. The harms interact. Persistent metabolic waste products degrade the effectiveness of cellular recycling systems, for example, and that probably exacerbates other sources of damage that arise from damaged cell components, misfolded proteins, and the like. There are many other examples of the way in which forms of damage might interact with one other, but there is also a lot of room for theory and speculation, since a complete map is lacked of the detailed progression of aging from its root causes through to age-related disease and death. Researchers have a catalog of the simple forms of damage at the beginning of the road, a catalog of complex diseases at the end of the picture, and only the first sketches of the story in between. Fortunately, if you have the catalog of damage you don't need the full picture in order to build treatments based on repair. Unfortunately the majority of the scientific community is more interested in filling in the gaps in the picture than in producing treatments.

As to speculation: given the list of forms of damage outlined in the SENS vision of aging, it is interesting to consider which of them are working in concert. If mitochondrial DNA damage was repaired throughout the body, would it result in diminished levels of misbehaving senescent cells, for example? Generally cells become senescent in response to a tissue environment that appears more damaged, or in response to the presence of toxins that might have that effect. Does the presently partially understood set of influences include the state of mitochondrial damage in a straightforward way? That is hard to tell in absence of good ways to control that damage experimentally. The fastest approach to answering this sort of question at the present point in time is probably to implement mitochondrial repair treatments in mice and see what happens.

Mitochondrial effectors of cellular senescence: beyond the free radical theory of aging

Cellular senescence is a process that results from a variety of stresses, leading to a state of irreversible growth arrest. Senescent cells accumulate during aging and have been implicated in promoting a variety of age-related diseases. Mitochondrial stress is an effective inducer of cellular senescence, but the mechanisms by which mitochondria regulate permanent cell growth arrest are largely unexplored.

The free radical theory of aging has been adapted to the study of cellular senescence. Many studies show that reactive oxygen species (ROS) can induce cellular senescence. Indeed, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), which is considered as the major ROS within the cell, is a potent inducer of cellular senescence in many cell types. While exogenous treatment with H2O2 can promote cellular senescence, endogenous ROS (such as superoxides and hydroxyl radicals) is also implicated in the establishment and maintenance of the irreversible growth arrest.

While several studies implicate the role of ROS during cellular senescence, others also suggest that mitochondrial ROS generation may not necessarily be the primary cause of cellular senescence. One [study] suggests that increased mitochondrial ROS production in replicative senescent cells is a consequence of the senescence phenotype rather than the reverse. Because mitochondria influence many cellular processes, accumulation of mitochondrial oxidative damage, as proposed in the free radical theory of aging, may be an oversimplification of the signaling mechanisms involved in the establishment of cellular senescence. It is also possible that mitochondrial ROS can act as signaling molecules to trigger cellular senescence, independent of mitochondrial oxidative damage, although this hypothesis still needs to be proven.

It is then necessary to go beyond the free radical theory and examine other mitochondrial effectors that may be involved in the irreversible cell growth arrest. Multiple mitochondrial factors, such as excessive mitochondrial ROS production, aberrant mitochondrial dynamics, defective electron transport chain, imbalanced bioenergetics, activated AMPK, decreased NAD+ levels, altered metabolism, and dysregulated mitochondrial calcium homeostasis, contribute to the establishment of irreversible growth arrest. All of these different mitochondrial signaling pathways can regulate each other, but how these factors cooperate to promote cellular senescence, and whether these pathways are conserved in all senescent cells still remains unclear.

As you can probably tell, this is one of those "look at all these things we don't know yet!" papers. I see a lot of these day in and day out. There is indeed a great deal that is still a big blank space on the map of how exactly we age, and that is exactly why more of a focus should be placed on the development of repair technologies based on what is presently well known.


We're probably going to need some forms of supercomputing, machine learning, and AI to help accelerate our progress. Biology is so complicated, after all. Fortunately AI is a hot field right now. If and when it is applied to biotechnology and medicine then things should start to pick up. Here's to hoping, anyway.

Posted by: APersonOnline at November 29th, 2014 12:10 AM

@Person - The point of the SENS approach is that if aging is due to simple classes of damage, then perhaps knowing exactly how the human body functions at a molecular level is unnecessary to keep it going in a youthful condition.

For example, people with Type 1 diabetes are unable to produce enough insulin, but are kept alive by injections of replacement insulin, we don't need to know exactly how insulin affects all of metabolism in order to carry out this fix.

Given the massive benefits to humanity of ending the pain and suffering caused by aging, it is worth investigating damage repair, probably on a similar level to the 20 billion international effort to build a fusion tokamak in France. Unfortunately the public and politicians aren't on board with aging research yet. Yes aging may turn out to be more complicated than what is proposed in the SENS hypothesis. But it is definitely worth investigating fully.

Posted by: Jim at November 29th, 2014 4:24 AM

We don't need to simulate every detail of a city damaged by an earthquake to begin fixing it. Waiting for the entire proteome, connectome, genome, metabolome to be mapped comprehensively will take at least many decades. A lot of progress could be made before that.

Posted by: Arren Brandt at November 29th, 2014 4:26 AM

I'm guessing that once the SENS foundation has the maximally modifiable mouse (MMM) and the genes with tags to allow transfer of the mRNA to the mitochondria, they'll be able to test this in adult mice and tease out the actual effects of mitochondrial gene deletions on cell senescence and overall aging.

Posted by: Jim at November 29th, 2014 5:34 PM

Arren: We don't need to map everything comprehensively to make progress, but, to continue your analogy, we need to know enough about city development to make sure we're not connecting, say, the tap water to the sewage system.

In a previous post, it was pointed out that serious, experienced researchers can't agree on the role of mitochondrial function. We need more and better data (bring on the mice studies) and interpretation (bring on the AI).

Posted by: Slicer at November 29th, 2014 7:46 PM

If people are dying of thirst maybe we should take some chances. Reason has enough of this on this blog. End the caution and start doing serious testing of therapies.

Posted by: Arren Brandt at November 29th, 2014 11:01 PM

In this case it's pretty clear cut - if we can get rid of senescent cells at will, then how they come to be instantly becomes irrelevant. And putting great effort into figuring out their origins would be akin to spending billions figuring out in extreme detail exactly what's going on in cases of scurvy, after we know it can be cured altogether with vitamin C.

Posted by: Arcanyn at November 30th, 2014 1:17 AM

Show me anything that can get rid of senescent cells and only those cells and I'll gladly sign myself up for human testing, and I haven't even gotten seriously hit by senescence yet. If there's any avenue of direct treatment that has a hope in hell of working, find some aging billionaire who isn't interested in dying and fund it. (Google is doing exactly this with Calico.)

Posted by: Slicer at November 30th, 2014 2:59 PM

To me this (follow the url) is the most interesting potential near-term therapy aimed at destruction of senescent cells. Hopefully more data from this group will be released soon. And yeah, if only there were some well-informed aging billionaires.

Posted by: gheme at November 30th, 2014 10:24 PM

I don't think you would really need a mouse to live two years longer to see if allotopic expression was worth doing. There are other mitochondrial mutations that are going to be treated with similar conventional gene therapy. Therefore the main challenge is just going to be the hydro-phobicity aspect.

Posted by: Michael-2 at December 1st, 2014 12:52 AM

As for senscent cells suicide gene therapy is apparently quite hard so it would be good if there were some practical mechanical solution. Aside from that it would be interesting to see how common they are in the body. I read on a blog that there was 5 organisations apparently working on the problem privately. Whether or not that is true who knows.

Posted by: Michael-2 at December 1st, 2014 12:59 AM

I just hope any treatment that is effective in mice doesn't get stuck im "The funding valley of death". I was shocked and amazed to find that the DRACO anti viral system from MIT had now ground to a halt due to lack of funding. Something that may be able to cure the comon cold, the flu, and Ebola should surely have an easy time raising funding. But apparently not as they are now trying to get a kickstarter style campaign going at

Posted by: Jim at December 1st, 2014 3:41 AM

Gheme: Seems straightforward and feasible enough. I don't live in Spain, but I hope they complete their research soon.

Jim: There's seriously no funding for something that might literally cure all viruses, assuming that it can always tell the difference between infected and uninfected cells? They ought to start talking to, say, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

Posted by: Slicer at December 1st, 2014 3:23 PM

Post a comment; thoughtful, considered opinions are valued. Comments incorporating ad hominem attacks, advertising, and other forms of inappropriate behavior are likely to be deleted.

Note that there is a comment feed for those who like to keep up with conversations.