A Tour of Sex Differences in Immune Aging
The immune system declines with age, and this causes more than just a progressive failure to adequately defend against infectious pathogens. The immune system is deeply involved in normal tissue function, maintenance, and regeneration. It is also responsible for destroying senescent and potentially cancerous cells throughout the body. Thus immune decline both degrades tissue function and increases the risk of cancer. Researchers tend to bucket aspects of immune aging into two broad categories, immunosenescence and inflammaging. Immunosenescence is the loss of capacity, while inflammation is a continual overactivation of the immune system, placing it in a state of chronic, unresolved inflammatory signaling.
There are obviously sex differences in the pace and structure of degenerative aging. In our species, women live longer but suffer greater disability. Given that the immune system touches on so much of heath and tissue function, we might expect to find a catalog of specific differences in immune system aging between the sexes. This is indeed the case. Today's open access paper provides a tour of what is known on this topic. It is possible that comparisons between the sexes might teach us useful things about aging, but equally the causes of aging are the same from individual to individual. The differences lie in the way in which damage spirals out into interacting webs of dysfunction and further damage. A therapy that targets an underlying cause of aging should be useful to all older individuals, though it is certainly possible that it will be more useful for some categories of individual than for others.
The problem with one-size-fits-all medicine: Biological sex and the aging immune system
The immune system can be divided into two categories: innate and adaptive. Innate immune cells (e.g., neutrophils, macrophages, and dendritic cells [DCs]) release cytokines and pro-inflammatory mediators that coordinate the immune response and protect the host. By contrast, the adaptive immune system provides a targeted and long-term defense against pathogens. While innate responses are rapid and general, adaptive immunity is slower and highly specific.
Like other biological systems, the immune system undergoes age-related functional decline. Indeed, the latest hallmarks of aging recognized by the field now include chronic inflammation as a distinct hallmark, recognizing its crucial role in aging phenotypes. Changes in the immune system can both promote or restrain aging across multiple organs. Two main characteristics of immune aging are 'immunosenescence' and 'inflammaging'. Together, these processes promote the development of age-associated diseases (e.g., atherosclerosis, dementia, osteoarthritis). Understanding hallmarks of immune aging is critical, as they influence both life span and healthspan.
In addition to shared age-related changes, sex differences further shape immune aging. Sex differences lead to divergent patterns of life span and healthspan between males and females. Overall, females tend to live longer than males, yet experience more age-related and immune-related diseases, whereas males are more likely to develop severe outcomes from infections. This discrepancy, in which females outlive males but spend more years in poor health, is referred to as the 'morbidity-mortality' paradox. One potential driver of sex differences in disease susceptibility and health outcomes is maternal-fetal microchimerism, which has been shown to modulate the immune system. However, sex differences in disease susceptibility and health outcomes are thought to be mainly driven by the effect of sex chromosomes (XX versus XY) and/or sex hormones on the immune system.
Indeed, the X chromosome contains many immune genes, some of which escape X inactivation with aging, contributing to stronger immune responses in females. By contrast, the Y chromosome encodes relatively few immune genes, which contributes to sex differences in immune system robustness. Reflecting this difference in copy number, females generally produce more cytokines than males regardless of age. Sex-steroid receptors are expressed broadly in immune cells, though absolute levels vary. Estrogens exert both pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory effects, depending on concentrations, whereas androgens suppress immune activity.
With aging, females maintain adaptive immune responses more effectively than males, suggesting that the female immune system has higher baseline activity, with stronger expression of adaptive versus innate immune pathways. Conversely, aging males rely more heavily on innate immunity, which may partly explain heightened innate responses but poorer outcomes following infections and vaccinations. This sex difference may be due to overall higher levels of testosterone in males, which has been shown to have important impacts the immune system over time. However, while stronger immune responses provide protection in females, they also increase autoimmunity risk with age. Sex differences in immune aging highlight how differences in both adaptive and innate immunity shape lifelong susceptibility to infections and age-related diseases, emphasizing the importance of sex as a biological variable in both immunological research and clinical care.