I'm pleased to note that the book A History of Life Extensionism in the Twentieth Century is now freely available online, a step that everyone who publishes should undertake. After the initial wave of sales is done there is simply no reason to leave a book locked up: everyone who wants to pay to read it already has, and everyone who wants to read it for free will simply download a copy whether or not formally permitted to do so. Both author and audience are far better served by making it easier to read published works.
In this case, A History of Life Extensionism in the Twentieth Century was published last year as the culmination of several years of research and writing on the topic by author Ilia Stambler. His book covers many past contributions to the culture of medicine and views on longevity, influences that lead us to where we stand today, but are perhaps too easily overlooked by those of us focused on the near future. It is a fascinating read. Beyond this work Stambler is active in a number of longevity advocacy movements; you might recall his contributions to the position papers published following last year's International Conference on Aging and Disease, for example.
One of the more interesting things one sees from the references explored in A History of Life Extensionism in the Twentieth Century is just how strikingly similar the proposals and debates on extended longevity were a century or more ago. Many of the commentaries that dealt with motivations for the defeat of age-related disease could be republished today largely unchanged and still fit right in. The important difference between then and now is that we are today able to make meaningful progress towards the goal of rejuvenation treatments: we can create detailed plans built on solid science such as the SENS research programs, knowing that building them has a high expectation of producing large benefits to human health and longevity. This is a new age of biotechnology, but it never hurts to look back at the bigger picture of how we came to be where we are now.
This work explores the history of life-extensionism in the 20th century. The term life-extensionism is meant to describe an ideological system professing that radical life extension (far beyond the present life expectancy) is desirable on ethical grounds and is possible to achieve through conscious scientific efforts. This work examines major lines of life-extensionist thought, in chronological order, over the course of the 20th century, while focusing on central seminal works representative of each trend and period, by such authors as Elie Metchnikoff, Bernard Shaw, Alexis Carrel, Alexander Bogomolets and others. Their works are considered in their social and intellectual context, as parts of a larger contemporary social and ideological discourse, associated with major political upheavals and social and economic patterns.
This work pursues three major aims. The first is to attempt to identify and trace throughout the century several generic biomedical methods whose development or applications were associated with radical hopes for life-extension. Beyond mere hopefulness, this work argues, the desire to radically prolong human life often constituted a formidable, though hardly ever acknowledged, motivation for biomedical research and discovery. It will be shown that novel fields of biomedical science often had their origin in far-reaching pursuits of radical life extension. The dynamic dichotomy between reductionist and holistic methods will be emphasized.
The second goal is to investigate the ideological and socio-economic backgrounds of the proponents of radical life extension, in order to determine how ideology and economic conditions motivated the life-extensionists and how it affected the science they pursued. For that purpose, the biographies and key writings of several prominent longevity advocates are studied. Their specific ideological premises (attitudes toward religion and progress, pessimism or optimism regarding human perfectibility, and ethical imperatives) as well as their socioeconomic conditions (the ability to conduct and disseminate research in a specific social or economic milieu) are examined in an attempt to find out what conditions have encouraged or discouraged life-extensionist thought. This research argues for the inherent adjustability of life-extensionism, as a particular form of scientific enterprise, to particular prevalent state ideologies.
The third, more general, aim is to collect a broad register of life-extensionist works, and, based on that register, to establish common traits and goals definitive of life-extensionism, such as valuation of life and constancy, despite all the diversity of methods and ideologies professed. This work will contribute to the understanding of extreme expectations associated with biomedical progress that have been scarcely investigated by biomedical history.