Eotaxin-1 as a Potentially Damaging Factor in Old Blood

Debate continues over the mechanisms responsible for the outcomes observed in parabiosis studies, in which a young and an old individual have their circulatory systems linked. The young individual shows a decline in measures of health, while the old individual shows an improvement - a modest reversal in some aspects of aging. That there must be harmful factors in old blood seems a solid conclusion, but are benefits to the older individual mediated by the presence of beneficial factors in young blood, or by dilution of harmful factors in old blood? There is evidence for both sides. Here, researchers outline some of the support for eotaxin-1 to be one of the harmful factors present in larger amounts in the bloodstream of older individuals, and consider possible implications for the blood transfusion industry.

High blood levels of the chemokine eotaxin-1 (CCL11) have recently been associated with aging and dementia, as well as impaired memory and learning in humans. Importantly, eotaxin-1 was shown to pass the blood-brain-barrier (BBB) and has been identified as crucial mediator of decreased neurogenesis and cognitive impairment in young mice after being surgically connected to the vessel system of old animals in a parabiosis model. It thus has to be assumed that differences in eotaxin-1 levels between blood donors and recipients might influence cognitive functions also in humans. However, it is unknown if eotaxin-1 is stable during processing and storage of transfusion blood components.

In this study, we show for the first time that ready-to-use transfusion blood components contain CCL11 at a physiological concentration. Importantly, in both blood components eotaxin-1 expression did not differ between males and females, but significantly increased with the donor's age in both sexes. Of note, eotaxin-1 levels detected in these processed, transfusible blood products are comparable with those found in unprocessed plasma of healthy individuals. We demonstrated that eotaxin-1 is subject to only minor donor-specific changes over 15 measurements within a 3-months period of time, even when samples have been taken at different times of day. Taken together, our findings and the available literature prove that eotaxin-1 is a relatively stable factor in fresh or processed blood components of one individual over a longer period of time, but significantly rises with increasing age.

Eotaxin-1 was found increased in Alzheimer's disease patients compared to age-matched controls. Eotaxin-1 correlated with impaired verbal and visual memory, and other conditions associated with cognitive decline, such as recurrent depression have also been associated with increased levels of the chemokine. Moreover, it was demonstrated that, among a range of cytokines and chemokines, eotaxin-1 correlated most strongly with reduced hippocampal neurogenesis and aging in mice, and importantly, artificially increasing eotaxin-1 levels in young mice resulted in decreased neurogenesis as well as in impaired memory and learning. Using mouse parabiosis models further proved that exposure of a young animal to the systemic milieu of an older mouse is sufficient to induce severe cognitive impairments and reduced neurogenesis after 2-5 weeks, and identify blood-borne eotaxin-1 as one of the responsible factors.

It has to be considered that a direct impact of short-term eotaxin-1 exposure on neurogenesis and mental factors has only been assessed in mice so far. It is unclear whether a single transfusion of high-eotaxin-1 containing blood components to recipients with very low levels will indeed change total eotaxin-1 levels in the recipient, if this elevation is transient or durable, and if it does indeed influence cognitive functions in humans. Future studies require a prospective study design to carefully resolve these questions.

Link: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2017.00402


My hypothesis: There is more Eotaxin-1 because there is more parasitic infection (undiagnosed) in the elderly.

"CCL11 (eotaxin-1) was originally discovered as an eosinophil-selective chemoattractant."

"Eosinophils, sometimes called eosinophiles or, less commonly, acidophils, are a variety of white blood cells and one of the immune system components responsible for combating multicellular parasites and certain infections in vertebrates."

Posted by: Lee at December 28th, 2017 9:39 AM

Apparently blood aging factors is a hot topic of aging research at the present time. Lucas Smith, Villeda et al published a 2017 paper in Cell Tissue Research titled The Systemic Environment: at the Interface of aging and adult neurogenesis. They have found a number of blood peptide factors that are at higher levels in aging individuals such as CCL11, CCL12, CCL2, CCL19 and B2M. Perhaps in the future these peptides can be eliminated from the blood so that they don't cause aging and cognition problems in the hippocampus, etc. At Harvard, researchers found that GDF11 was found at lower levels in the elderly, and about 20 people have tried a protocol to add GDF11 to their blood levels to reverse aging. I gather from some research papers that it did not work as expected, but I do not know if anything final has been determined.

Posted by: Biotechy at December 28th, 2017 1:17 PM

Just do parabiosis, but use hemodialysis to filter out everything in the older individual's blood. The younger individual should experience a minimal change in health while the older one experiences a benefit. This experiment would also show if it's over the dilution of younger factors, since older stuff in the old blood is hemodialysis out.

Posted by: william toth at December 30th, 2017 3:26 PM

It should be a relatively simple matter to mop up excess eotaxin with mAbs. If there are half a dozen or more other bad actors, as suggested by the Smith et al. paper that Biotechy mentioned, then this may or may not be a promising approach.

Posted by: george at March 15th, 2018 10:27 PM
Comment Submission

Post a comment; thoughtful, considered opinions are valued. New comments can be edited for a few minutes following submission. Comments incorporating ad hominem attacks, advertising, and other forms of inappropriate behavior are likely to be deleted.

Note that there is a comment feed for those who like to keep up with conversations.