Aubrey de Grey in Fine Form on the Ethical Imperative to Defeat Aging

Aubrey de Grey, cofounder of the Methuselah Foundation and SENS Research Foundation, has little patience for those people who persist in clinging to the idea that it is in any way acceptable to let the death and suffering caused by aging continue. If we lived in a world in which there was nothing we could do, then perhaps accepting aging would be the sensible thing to do. But we do not. We live in a world in which the first rejuvenation therapies capable of reversing a root cause of aging, the accumulation of senescent cells, are entering human trials. Numerous other classes of potential rejuvenation therapy are well described, well understood, and only lacking sufficient financial support to move forward at the same pace. Aging and all of its consequences can be brought under medical control: all that is needed is the will and the funding to move ahead and get the job done.

Having publicly declared that the first person to live for more than a millennium is likely alive today, de Grey has dedicated large amounts of energy and time to the pursuit of medical technology which may one day allow humans to live indefinitely. Having graduated with a degree in computer science in 1985, de Grey switched fields in his late twenties upon discovering "the horrifying fact that most people, and indeed most biologists, viewed ageing as not very important or interesting." He appears both astonished and disgusted that the world pays so little attention to ageing, the one malady which affects us all.

De Grey defines ageing as "the collection of types of damage that the body does to itself throughout life as consequences of its normal operation." His major breakthrough came through the realisation that rather than attempting to delay the damage inflicted by ageing, as was the established practice, gerontologists could do better by repairing this damage after it has occurred. This idea, though "counterintuitive" to many of his colleagues, has now become "totally mainstream" in the field, and forms the basis of the Strategies for Engineered Negligible Senescence (SENS) Research Foundation which de Grey co-founded in 2009.

Speaking of the work taking place at SENS, and around the world, de Grey proudly declares that there have been "huge advances" in implementing his theory of damage repair. "Among the most high-profile is the ability to remove senescent cells using certain drugs, but there's a lot more that is more esoteric, such as making backup copies of the mitochondrial DNA in the nucleus and introducing bacterial enzymes to eliminate otherwise indigestible waste products." Asked about the biggest barriers currently facing progress, de Grey replies: "Money, money and money." He blames the field's financial struggles on "the desperation that almost all people have to put ageing out of their minds and pretend that it is some kind of blessing in disguise, so that they can get on with their miserably short lives without being preoccupied by the terrible thing that awaits them." According to de Grey, this attitude is "psychologically understandable but morally inexcusable".

De Grey rejects criticism of his field as "unnatural", citing this challenge as another "great example of the desperation of so many people to switch off their brains when confronted with the need to discuss the defeat of ageing." Towards those who make the "unnatural" claim, de Grey is both indignant and dismissive: "It takes about ten IQ points and ten milliseconds to notice that the whole of technology is 'unnatural' - including, of course, the whole of medicine - endeavours that those who voice this objection do not tend to oppose."

Morally, de Grey does not have any doubts about the quest to extend life: "For something to be an ethical issue it has to be a meaningful dilemma and in order to make that case one must make the case either that people who were born a long time ago have less entitlement to health, as a human right, than younger people, or that health itself is a lesser human right than other things that might end up being mutually exclusive with it, like parenthood. Once one focuses on the fact that this is just medicine, that any longevity effects would be just side-effects of health, the 'ethics' of the matter rather rapidly vaporises."



One problem is that Aubrey is trying to use reason combating an emotional response. Since there is next to nothing the current medical treatments could do against aging the mainstream mind rightfully so decides to not even bother with the problem and pick its battles. After that we are to good at rationalizing or decisions. Especially when there is no overwhelming experimental evidence which cannot be easily dismissed.

Aging is an extremely hard problem. And one with very high emotional risk for the researches and policy makers.

On the other hand, the moment first treatment is proven to work in humans everybody (old enough) will want it personally. And it cannot be uninvented. And that's the washed moment. The moment the first real treatment becomes available. There will be moral battles for and against but you cannot really stop it. But for now we are waiting for the senolitics to be proven. And the very same forces were showing the research will attract financial streams. But not even a moment before...

Posted by: Cuberat at April 30th, 2018 8:51 AM

Like with many things, 90% of the people I introduce SENS to are completely unaware of the issues and advances that are being made. It's usually the first time they've heard about it and extreme longevity tech in general. I'm in the camp that believes this general lack of public awareness is not by accident, and that MSM is organized not to report on it.

Bravo Editor for this string of three articles that gets to the reasons why and hope for beyond this.

Posted by: Tom Schaefer at April 30th, 2018 10:19 AM
Comment Submission

Post a comment; thoughtful, considered opinions are valued. New comments can be edited for a few minutes following submission. Comments incorporating ad hominem attacks, advertising, and other forms of inappropriate behavior are likely to be deleted.

Note that there is a comment feed for those who like to keep up with conversations.