Calorie Restriction Started in Old Age Does Not Extend Life in Mice

Researchers here establish that calorie restriction started in late life does not extend life in mice, contradicting older research results showing that it does to some degree. This may be a difference resulting from mouse lineage or housing or diet prior to applying calorie restriction. The researchers here point to the behavior of fat tissue in the older mice as being important, so we might think that perhaps the mice in the two studies began calorie restriction with differing amounts of fat tissue.

In any case this is a reminder that the practice of calorie restriction - and therefore treatments that mimic some of its effects - are a method of slowing aging, not reversing aging. For the full benefit to emerge, calories must be restricted, or the treatment applied, throughout much of life. This makes it a comparatively poor area of study when it comes to the development of human therapies to treat aging.

Mice live longer and are healthier in old age if they are given 40 percent less to eat after reaching adulthood than animals who are allowed to eat as much as they want. The dieting mice are fed with food enriched with vitamins and minerals to prevent malnutrition. But if food intake is first reduced in mice first start eating less food when they are already seniors, the researchers observe little or no effect on the life expectancy of the mice. On the other hand, when mice are allowed to eat as much as they like after a period of reduced food intake, they have no long-term protection, so reduced food intake has to be sustained for mice to reap the benefits. Reduced food intake must therefore be implemented early and be sustained until the end of their lives to have positive effects on health in old age.

But why do older mice no longer react to the change in diet? Researchers investigated gene activity in different organs. While the gene activity in the liver quickly adapted when mice are transferred to a restricted diet, the scientists observed a 'memory effect' in the fat tissue of older animals. Although the mice lose weight, the activity of the genes in the fat tissue is similar to that of the mice that continue to eat as much as they want. In addition, the fat composition in old mice does not change as much as in young mice.

This memory effect mainly affects mitochondria, the cells' power houses, which play an important role in the ageing process. Usually, reduced food intake leads to increased formation of mitochondria in fatty tissue. But the study showed that this is no longer the case when older mice are switched to a lower calorie diet. This inability to change at the genetic and metabolic levels may contribute to the shortened lifespan of these animals.

Link: https://www.mpg.de/14021239/1017-balt-110438-health-in-old-age-is-a-lifelong-affair

Comments

Good!

One more intervention I can kick off my list

Posted by: jon ramsmen at October 31st, 2019 7:26 AM

of course it dosent. CR is the weakest intervention in my opinion. it might have health benefits but it is basicly useless for longevity. only way to get any meaningful increase is to target and repair all the hallmarks of aging directly.

Posted by: scott at October 31st, 2019 11:03 AM

No need to look further than your local nursing home to realize calorie restriction is not very effective. Most elderly eat very minimal and are already minimizing calorie intake, and yet they don't seem to get healthier because of it.

Posted by: Person1234 at October 31st, 2019 12:08 PM

We have been informed that intermittent fasting does not extend the life of old rats for 40 years. And after forty years, it is clear that it does not extend the life of young people.

Posted by: Dobrota at November 3rd, 2019 10:05 AM

Post a comment; thoughtful, considered opinions are valued. Comments incorporating ad hominem attacks, advertising, and other forms of inappropriate behavior are likely to be deleted.

Note that there is a comment feed for those who like to keep up with conversations.