TransVision 2006 Roundup

The TransVision 2006 conference - with the theme of "Emerging Technologies of Human Enhancement" - finished up this weekend in Helsinki. The worldwide transhumanist community provides a great deal of drive and material support to healthy life extension initiatives such as the Methuselah Foundation and MPrize for anti-aging research. As in any distributed collection of like-minded folk, there's a great deal more talk than action, but don't let that fool you into thinking that no action is taking place.

Video, discussion and reports from the event are making their way around the web. Here is a small selection of links:

Flicker photo set (including the obligatory appearance by biomedical gerontologist Aubrey de Grey in the local media)

Linking the real conference to a virtual space in Second Life

Many conference videos. Please do your part to take the bandwidth load off the organizer's servers; reformatting and posting to Google Video or YouTube would be very helpful.

Presentation materials from the various speakers. Aubrey de Grey's presentation is in the mix in both PDF and PowerPoint formats.

"I'm about as un-transhumanist as can be: I don't even want my nipples pierced. I wouldn't mind living longer though" - Chris Gray at HETHR

Conference community blog

Immortality Institute TransVision 2006 discussion thread

Quite interestingly, even though these people are mostly known in transhumanist circles, I was suprised about their considerable agreement that life extension is the most pressing and important issue at the moment and must be prioritized accordingly


I got interviewed by an Italian TV crew making documentary about the post-human condition. They said the documentary will probably have couple of million viewers. It will be aired in November, the program is called "C'ERA UNA VOLTA" which I have no idea what it means. The interviewer said the documentary will donwloadable from the tv-station website (the Italian equivalent of BBC, the specific channel is RAI 3) once it comes out.


We had quite the speculative fest with Aubrey [de Grey] about the reasons why big pharma companies have yet to take on the issue of anti aging despite the tremendous potential of making major cash and their obvious advantage on that area.

The last point is an interesting one; I believe it has much to do with the extent of regulation in medicine. The present structure and culture of regulation revolves around defining conditions and preventing anyone from commercializing products to do anything other than treat the results of those conditions. If you can't commercialize, there will be no funding for research and development. If there is no funding, no-one will mount challenges to the status quo.

In a system that actively discourages innovation and paradigm change, there will be little innovation or movement towards paradigm change. Sad but true. This is why practical medical technology lags far behind the cutting edge of what we know to be possible: our access to the best and newest technologies is being regulated to death at every level of the research and development cycle.

Unregulated industries advance at the pace of science. Did you know that venture funded companies are developing quantum computers already, for example? It was a matter of a few short years to run from working out the math, running the first experiments, and then right into business. That simply doesn't happen in medicine anymore. It could, but it doesn't, because pointless, useless, wasteful layers of government intervention ensure that everything is slow, expensive and of lower quality.

Technorati tags: , , ,


Regarding the videos: it actually looks like they're being hosted by the University of Finland CS department, so I wouldn't worry about bandwidth. :-) Reformatting for YouTube or GV would be helpful just to make them more accessible, though.

Posted by: Michael Anissimov at August 20th, 2006 4:36 PM
Comment Submission

Post a comment; thoughtful, considered opinions are valued. New comments can be edited for a few minutes following submission. Comments incorporating ad hominem attacks, advertising, and other forms of inappropriate behavior are likely to be deleted.

Note that there is a comment feed for those who like to keep up with conversations.