Further Assessing the Effects of Air Pollution on Mortality

There is ample evidence to show that air pollution correlates with increased mortality, and a number of natural experiments have allowed researchers to compare populations with similar socioeconomic status and different levels of air pollution, in order to demonstrate that effects do not result from wealth disparities. The consensus on why air pollution correlates with mortality is that interaction between particulates and lung tissue provokes greater systemic inflammatory signaling. That raised chronic inflammation accelerates the progression of all of the common fatal age-related conditions.

We aimed to report real-world longitudinal ambient air pollutants levels compared to WHO Air Quality Guidelines (AQG) and analyze multiple air pollutants' joint effect on longevity, and the modification and confounding from the climate and urbanization with a focus on the oldest-old. This study included 13,207 old participants with 73.3% aged 80 and beyond, followed up from 2008 to 2018 in 23 Chinese provinces. We used the Cox-proportional hazards model and quantile-based g-computation model to measure separate and joint effects of the multiple pollutants. We adjusted for climate and area economic factors based on a directed acyclic graph.

In 2018, no participants met the WHO AQG for PM2.5 and O3, and about one-third met the AQG for NO2. The hazard ratio (HR) for mortality was 1.07 per decile increase in all three pollutants, with PM2.5 being the dominant contributor according to the quantile-based g-computation model. In the three-pollutant model, the HRs for PM2.5 and NO2 were 1.27 and 1.08 per 10 μg/m3 increase, respectively. The oldest-old experienced a much lower mortality risk from air pollution compared to the young-old. The mortality risk of PM2.5 was higher in areas with higher annual average temperatures. The adjustment of road density considerably intensified the association between NO2 and mortality. The ambient PM2.5 and O3 levels in China exceeded the WHO AQG target substantially. Multiple pollutants coexposure, confounding, and modification of the district economic and climate factors should not be ignored in the association between air pollution and mortality.

Link: https://doi.org/10.1021/envhealth.3c00106


Always wondered about the mechanisms of diminished health, chronic inflammation, and reduced recovery due to air quality in moderately wealthy, non-heavy-industrial areas. That being said, I would guess that 'inside' air quality and its ability to be monitored and managed would be at least as influential in overall health and ability to age with reduced complications, especially in four-season areas where abundant outside ventilation is less desirable in winter. Humidification, specialized filters, and fresh air supplementation is typical on upgraded home and work systems. Any other research or anecdotes on same?

Posted by: Jer at February 8th, 2024 7:54 AM

We live in mountains and though our main heating source is a pellet stove, we often use the fireplace in conjunction when its colder, like now. But we have a couple decent air cleaners and we have air sensors showing amount of particulates in the air. Surprisingly, fireplace doesn't produce a huge amount of pollution as expected, between 0 and 5, unless the dog is moving around

Posted by: Robert at February 8th, 2024 10:31 AM
Comment Submission

Post a comment; thoughtful, considered opinions are valued. New comments can be edited for a few minutes following submission. Comments incorporating ad hominem attacks, advertising, and other forms of inappropriate behavior are likely to be deleted.

Note that there is a comment feed for those who like to keep up with conversations.